Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 12 · 2026-10-15

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

In a number of countries, some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities. Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport.

Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

 

Student answer (Band 5.5)

Investigation of the modern world mirrors that government is budget and budget sharing the focus of the thoughts and their policies are establishment could move from line to lire, a group of individuals contemplate that government should allocate a large amount of country's budget on febricating modern railway tracks for fast trains among different cities, while other deny the above statement by saying that government should should expend money on the prevalent public transport. This essay will evaluate both perspectives prior to reaching a definitive conclusion.

The utmost consideration is that a bunch of individuals claim that government shoud disburse a huge amount of money to erecting new railways lines which run among various cities for fast trains. The construstion of these railway lines will be beneficial for the developent of the country which will create plenty of new projects in the country. As a result, there will be plethora of job apportunities for cities and it will be beneficial for the progress and prosperty of the county.

The second compelling sanity is that, other people repudiate the above views by saying that government show spend money for ameliorating pre-existing public transport it will save a huge amount of county's budget which can spend on other the improvment of other fields, such as health, education and safety. As a result the quality of eduacation and public health will enhance. Many poor citizens which does not effort quality of eduaction due to high expences, will have chance to be educate and to contribute in the development of science and county, as well as, the the individuals who are fighting will deadly diseases will be able to get effective treatment.

Following the above analyzation it is crystal clear that government should allocate some budget on the improment of current public transport to save money which can be place in other areas where is needed. As a result, it will not only beneficial for jobs opportuinty as well as for wellfare.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.5

You address both sides of the discussion and state a clear preference for improving existing public transport in the conclusion. The points about railway construction creating projects and jobs, and transport savings being available for health and education, are relevant. However, the two views are not developed equally: the case for fast rail is largely limited to employment and national progress, without explaining its transport benefits, while the second view shifts into education and healthcare rather than showing how better public transport itself helps citizens. Your conclusion gives a position, but the reasoning behind it is only briefly summarised. Explain the practical effects of each investment and support them with a specific example to make the response more fully developed.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0

The response has a recognisable structure: an introduction, one paragraph for each view, and a concluding opinion. This gives the reader an overall route through the discussion, and phrases such as “The second compelling…” signal a change of viewpoint. However, progression within paragraphs is sometimes difficult to follow. In the second body paragraph, the link from improving transport to spending savings on education and healthcare is asserted rather than clearly explained. Some transitions, including “As a result,” are repeated, and the conclusion introduces “jobs opportunity” again without clearly connecting it to the stated preference. Use clearer topic sentences and make each supporting point follow logically from the previous one; vary linking expressions and use pronouns or references precisely.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

You attempt a range of formal and less common vocabulary, including “allocate,” “ameliorating,” “pre-existing,” and “definitive conclusion.” However, many choices are inaccurate or unnatural, which sometimes makes the intended meaning hard to understand. For example, “compelling sanity” appears to mean a compelling argument, and “government show spend” does not express the intended idea. Spelling errors such as “construstion,” “developent,” and “eduacation” are also noticeable. Some phrases, including “huge amount of money” and “beneficial for the progress,” are repetitive or imprecise. Prioritise accurate, natural collocations over unusually formal words, and proofread spelling and word forms.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You attempt both simple and complex sentences, including a relative clause in “citizens which does not effort quality of eduaction” and a conditional idea about money being spent elsewhere. However, complex structures are often faulty, and errors frequently make sentences difficult to interpret. For example, the opening sentence has no clear grammatical structure, while “government should should expend” repeats the modal and “government show spend” has an incorrect verb form. Agreement and clause construction also need attention: “Many poor citizens … will have chance” lacks a clear, correctly formed clause, and the final sentence combines “not only” and “as well as” incorrectly. Practise building shorter, accurate sentences first, then add subordinate clauses and check subject–verb agreement, articles, and punctuation.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.