Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 12 · 2026-10-17

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

In a number of countries, some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities. Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport.

Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

 

Student answer (Band 6.0)

In many nations, it is debated whether to spend a money on establishing a new railway tracks for speed train or to enhance existing public transport. In my opinion, the construction of a new railway lines is convenient because people can travel comfortably and in the short period of time. However, I firmly believe, improving existing transportation is more crucial because rails are not suitable in every geographical location.

One major aspect of railways is that they are comfortable. People can sit comfortably in a train because trains have spacious space and comfortable seats inside. Furthermore, speed train can take passengers to their destination in the very short period of time. For instance, in Japan, people mainly talk about their bullet train. How fast they are and how smooth they are. This is because they are designed it such a way people can fell relax and travel fast. This is why travel in a fast trains become more comfortable with the less amout of time.

On the other hand, especially, fast trains are not suitable in eyery places. Geography poses threat to these train because countries with hill and with the himalaya cannot afford these trains. It is better to make existing transportation better by modifying roads and other ways. For example, in Nepal, mayor of Kathmandu Valley planned to construct railway tracks in 2020. However, geography rejected an idea because trains especially fast train do not suit the geography of Kathmandu Valley. Therefore, he allocated the budget to enhance roads rather than rails. Now, transfort become more and more comfortable for public.

In conclusion, although constructing fast trains can make travel faster and comfortable, I strongly concur that this idea is not suitable for every geographical location. So, it is better to enhance the quality of existing transport in these places.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0

You address both sides of the discussion and state a clear preference for improving existing transport, especially where geography makes high-speed rail impractical. The examples of Japan’s bullet trains and Kathmandu Valley help illustrate the contrast, and your conclusion reflects your position. However, the case for new railways is developed mainly through comfort and speed, while the opposing case relies heavily on one geographical limitation. The claim that railways are unsuitable in places with hills or the Himalayas is broad and would benefit from a more precise explanation or supporting detail. To strengthen the response, explain more fully how upgrading existing transport benefits a wider range of people or locations, and acknowledge circumstances where new rail links could be worthwhile.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.5

The response has a clear overall structure: an introduction, separate paragraphs for the two views, and a conclusion. The contrast marker “On the other hand” makes the shift between arguments easy to follow, and examples are placed alongside the relevant points. This meets the lower-band expectation of coherent organisation and shows some features of stronger progression. However, links within sentences are occasionally awkward or unclear, as in “This is because they are designed it such a way people can fell relax and travel fast.” The Japan example also breaks into short fragments (“How fast they are and how smooth they are”), interrupting the flow. Use complete sentences and clearer references, and connect each example explicitly to the argument it supports.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

You use enough topic vocabulary to communicate the main ideas, including “railway tracks,” “public transport,” “geography,” and “allocated the budget.” There are also attempts at more specific language, such as “spacious space” and “geography poses threat,” but several choices are inaccurate or repetitive, limiting precision. Examples include “speed train,” “in the very short period of time,” and “transfort”; spelling errors such as “eyery” and “amout” also reduce control. Some phrases may make the reader pause to interpret the intended meaning. Build a more reliable range of transport collocations and check spelling, while avoiding repeated use of “comfortable” and “fast.”

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5

You attempt both simple and more complex sentence forms, including a contrast clause in “although constructing fast trains can make travel faster and comfortable” and a reason clause beginning “because countries with hill…”. The overall meaning is generally understandable, but some grammatical errors recur. For example, “a new railway tracks” has an article and plural mismatch, while “people can fell relax” and “they are designed it such a way” show problems with verb forms and sentence construction. The fragment “How fast they are and how smooth they are” is also not a complete sentence. Practise accurate articles, subject–verb agreement, and complete clause structures, then proofread complex sentences to ensure their parts fit together.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.