Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 12 · 2026-10-23

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

In a number of countries, some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities. Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport.

Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

 

Student answer (Band 5.5)

In this contemporary world people often face problems in transporational facilties. As a result, there is an ongoing debate that some individuals believe that it is important to spending huge amount on railways to introduce new lines inorder to decrease the commuting time between urban areas. While other folks argue that it is better to renovated the existing public transportation.This essay will examine the both perceptive and conclude my opinion before conclusion.

On the one hand, it is definitely benefical for individuals to introduce new railway lines between developed areas. one of the major advantages is to reduce the commuting time for their workplaces because of rapid increase in traffic conjection individuals feel stressful, this approach makes the human lives even better. Moreover, their even reach faster than before may result to better productivity and spend these time with their loved ones. For instance , most of the employers and childrens are struggle to commuting to their places. In order to spending huge amount on developing new lines in cities make their lives less stressful.

On the other hand, some individuals demanding government to spent on existing public transporation for better comforts and facilities because people who come from low income families often face lot of difficulties in their financial situations. For instance, poor people cannot afforable to the charges of new transportional systems. Moreover, improving public transportation facilities leads to decrease in private vehicles can alomsot reduce the air pollution. As a result imposing funds on repairing public transport can brings to huge change in ecosystem.

In my opinion, repairing public transporation have lots of benefits even after railways line are place a vital role in commuting. Both developments are neccesary for country developments but I strongly believe improving public tranport is far more essential then railway lines.

In conclusion, spending equal amount of funds on both actions may be the better thing than imposing on one particular development

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.5

You address both sides of the discussion and state a preference for improving public transport, so the response is relevant to the task. The points about faster journeys and reduced stress support new railways, while affordability and lower pollution support upgrading existing services. However, the ideas are only partly developed: the example about employers and children is unclear, and the benefits of faster trains are asserted rather than explained with a specific illustration. Your position also shifts slightly: you favour improving public transport, but the conclusion recommends equal funding. Make your view consistent and explain why one option deserves priority, while developing each main point with a clear example.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0

The essay has a recognisable structure: an introduction, separate paragraphs for the two views, your opinion, and a conclusion. This makes the overall arrangement coherent, and signposts such as “On the one hand” and “On the other hand” help readers follow the discussion. However, some links are mechanical or unclear. For example, “Moreover, their even reach faster than before” does not clearly connect to the preceding point, and “As a result” introduces a consequence whose relationship to the previous sentence needs clearer explanation. The opinion paragraph and conclusion also do not fully align. Use clearer references and transitions, and ensure each paragraph develops one connected line of reasoning.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

You attempt topic-related vocabulary, including “commuting time,” “public transportation,” “air pollution,” and “ecosystem,” and you use some relevant expressions such as “low income families.” However, the range is limited by repeated general words such as “individuals,” “people,” and “better,” while frequent spelling and word-choice errors sometimes make meaning difficult to follow. Examples include “transporational facilties,” “traffic conjection,” and “afforable.” Some combinations are also unnatural, such as “imposing funds” and “huge change in ecosystem.” Build accuracy with transport collocations and check spelling carefully; more precise wording will help express your ideas without changing their meaning.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You attempt both simple and more complex sentences, including a reason clause beginning “because” and a contrast introduced by “While.” However, complex structures are often faulty, and errors occur frequently enough to make some sentences difficult to understand. For example, “it is important to spending” uses an incorrect verb pattern, while “improving public transportation facilities leads to decrease” is missing an article before “decrease.” There are also agreement and sentence-construction problems in “repairing public transporation have lots of benefits” and “most of the employers and childrens are struggle.” Practise accurate verb patterns, subject–verb agreement, articles, and complete sentence structures, then proofread punctuation and capitalisation.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.