Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 12 · 2026-10-23

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

In a number of countries, some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities. Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport.

Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

 

Student answer (Band 6.0)

It is believed by certain individuals that enormous amount of money should be spent on building new railway tracks to run the superfast trains between cities whereas others contend that money should be used on impoverishing existing public transport. The people who want superfast trains is mainly due to their need to travel across metropolitan cities for their jobs while others assert that money should be spent on present transport facilities in order to provide efficiency in time management and accessibility. In my opinion money should be invested on basis of need according to level of development as per country's own priorities.

The number of people contend that high speed trains should be run between cities because to ease the daily routine travel from one city to another significantly for the purpose of their service. For instance, someone who is an civil engineer and he/she does job in Bengaluru and does have to travel from his hometown in Pune, which is around 400 km away. Moreover, one can spend time with his/her family. Therefore these sort of people demand new railway infrastructure.

Conversely, others want to enhance current transportation facilities so as to manage the time and access to it at anytime of the day and night. To elaborate it, they want vehicles that may run effectively from diverse remote locations to the main towns and cities frequently at a faster speed. Meanwhile, the speed can be increased by installing higher capacity power engines and time timetable must be strictly regulated by authorities by taking special vigilance that no two buses/trams arrive at the same time. For example, students who belong to village and have to travel to far distant cities are encouraging for this tranformation. Morever, patients can be comfortably and rapidly access to cities hospitals at any time of night hours in case where ambulance fails to reach on time. I believe that developing countries like India at first focus on altering the existing railway facilities while developed nations like Japan or China should invest on bullet trains more frequently to ease their citizens travelling.

To conclude, countries can spend money to lessen the time that takes to travel while those who are developing ones can smoothen their current transport system.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0

You address both views and give a clear, conditional opinion: developing countries should improve existing transport, while more developed countries may invest in high-speed trains. The examples of a worker travelling between Pune and Bengaluru, rural students, and patients help make the discussion relevant. However, the first view is explained mainly through individual commuting needs, and the benefits of high-speed rail for wider connectivity or economic activity are not developed. The case for improving existing transport is more detailed, but some points—such as bus timetables and engine capacity—are not clearly linked to the broader comparison. To strengthen the response, explain the advantages and limitations of each investment more fully and make the conclusion reflect your reasoning more precisely.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0

The response has a recognisable structure: an introduction, a paragraph for each view, and a conclusion. Transitions such as “Conversely,” “For instance,” and “To conclude” help signal the direction of the discussion. Overall, the ideas can be followed, but some connections are mechanical or unclear. For example, “Meanwhile” does not clearly show how the point about engines relates to timetable regulation, and the final sentence introduces a contrast between developing and developed countries without summarising the reasons established earlier. Some references, including “these sort of people,” are also imprecise. Group related points more clearly, use linking expressions to show the exact relationship between ideas, and ensure the conclusion follows directly from the body paragraphs.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

You use a reasonable range of topic vocabulary, including “railway infrastructure,” “accessibility,” “remote locations,” and “transportation facilities,” and you attempt more formal expressions. However, several word choices and collocations are inaccurate or unnatural, sometimes making the intended meaning less clear. “Impoverishing existing public transport” reverses the intended meaning, while “tranformation” is misspelled and “service” is an awkward choice for employment. Phrases such as “time management” and “higher capacity power engines” are also imprecise in this context. Aim for natural collocations and check spelling and word forms carefully. More precise terms such as “improving,” “commuting,” and “engine capacity” would make the argument clearer and more fluent.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5

You attempt a mix of simple and complex sentences, including clauses introduced by “because,” “while,” and “in order to,” and the overall meaning is generally understandable. Some grammatical errors remain, particularly with agreement, articles, and sentence construction. For example, “The people who want superfast trains is” should use a plural verb, and “an civil engineer” has an incorrect article. The construction “patients can be comfortably and rapidly access to cities hospitals” is also faulty: the verb form and sentence pattern need to be revised. In addition, “someone who is an civil engineer and he/she does job” combines clauses awkwardly. Practise building accurate complex sentences and check subject–verb agreement, articles, and verb patterns during editing.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.