Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 12 · 2026-10-26

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

In a number of countries, some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities. Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport.

Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

 

Student answer (Band 6.0)

The question, between spending more money on new transportation system and improving existing transport, remains a matter of controversy. While some individuals believe the necessity of spending money on constructing new railway lines is more demanding than expending on existing system but others people have the opposite view. I agree with the foremost statement because to cope with the modern advancement, the development of new transportation system is inevitable.

As we are now living in fast-paced world, we must align with the modern advancement to make our life easier and developing new railway lines is the most suitable one to save our time as we can travel a long distance within short time by high speed trains. Authorities should invest more money on constructing new railways lines because it will lead to reduce the traffic also allow people to use different routes which in turns boost the industrialization of the country. For example, the government of Bangladesh are now planning to allocate more money in building new railway lines for electronic trains which will reduce the distance between capital and port city of Bangladesh, as a result the ease of commercialization will increase the economy of the country.

Some individuals prefer to spending money on existing transportation system because they are facing problem regularly when they go outside and they have to wait long for the new development. They think, immediate action by the authorities, will alleviate their problem if sufficient spending on existing transportation system decreases the traffic on road. Moreover, expending on current system involves increasing the number of trains on the existing railway lines so that the public can easily catch any train whenever they want without waiting for next one.

In conclusion, though it is necessary to spend on improving current system, I firmly believe the approach to new development is more beneficial for the public because ultimate it will save our time also ease the difficulties that people face while travelling to long distance.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.5

You address both sides of the discussion and state a clear preference for building new railway lines, including in the introduction and conclusion. Your reasons—faster long-distance travel, reduced road traffic and support for commerce—are relevant, and the Bangladesh example gives the argument some concrete support. The opposing view is also represented through waiting times and the possibility of running more trains on existing lines. However, this side is less fully developed, and some claims about new lines, such as their effect on traffic and industrialisation, are asserted rather than explained. To strengthen the response, compare the benefits and limitations of each investment more directly and develop the example with a clearer link to the argument.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.5

The response has a clear overall structure: an introduction, separate paragraphs for the two views, and a conclusion that restates your position. Ideas generally progress in a sensible order, and linking expressions such as “For example,” “Moreover,” and “In conclusion” help guide the reader. This gives the essay a coherent foundation. At times, however, connections are mechanical or unclear. The opening sentence is difficult to follow, and the long sentence beginning “Authorities should invest…” combines several effects without clearly showing how they relate. Some references, such as “the foremost statement” and “the approach to new development,” are also less direct than they could be. Use clearer topic sentences and divide complex chains of ideas into shorter, logically connected sentences.

Lexical Resource: Band 6.0

You use an adequate range of topic-related vocabulary, including “high speed trains,” “traffic,” “industrialization,” and “commercialization.” There are also attempts at more formal phrasing, such as “alleviate their problem” and “allocate more money.” However, several choices or combinations are unnatural or imprecise, including “modern advancement,” “the necessity…is more demanding,” and “ease of commercialization.” Repetition of “spending money,” “transportation system,” and “new railway lines” also limits flexibility. These issues do not prevent the reader from understanding your main points, but more natural collocations and precise wording would make the argument clearer. Build vocabulary around investment, capacity, connectivity and transport demand, and check that each phrase fits its intended meaning.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5

You attempt a mix of simple and complex sentences, including clauses introduced by “because,” “while” and “so that.” This allows you to express reasons and contrast, and the overall meaning is usually clear. Some grammatical errors remain, particularly with agreement, verb forms, articles and sentence construction. For example, “the government of Bangladesh are” should use a singular verb, while “it will lead to reduce” needs a different verb pattern. In “Some individuals prefer to spending,” the verb form after “prefer” is incorrect, and “in turns boost” does not agree with its subject. The opening sentence is also structurally awkward. Review verb patterns and subject–verb agreement, and edit long sentences for complete, well-controlled clauses.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.