Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 12 · 2026-10-30

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

In a number of countries, some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities. Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport.

Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

 

Student answer (Band 6.0)

Some people tend to believe that it is very important to spend a large amount of money on the construction of new and fast trains and trails linking cities. Whereas, other people give the opinion to spend money on already present public vehicles rather than investing on new projects. Both views are acceptable, however according to my point of view, intstead of investing on innovative new projects, government should repair already present transports.

It a common trend in developed nations that government spent a huge amount of money on roads, railways and bridges. People who live there usually like these kind of archichectures and they want their country to be more advanced and beautiful. Some countries, for instance, Japan and China has a very vast railway networking system and their government is investing more money on such projects. For example, Tokyo has a very huge railway system that trains move underground in more than 16 basement levels.

In the developing countries like Pakistan, India and Bangladesh, it would be a worst option to invest money on new railway projects. The condition of public transport like buses, metros and trains are very bad that these transport meet an accident every other day and people are very sad about the situation that they want these transports to be repaired. For example, I was watching news yesterday in which it was shown that two public buses collided with eachother due to break failure.

To conclude with, investments in railway stations are good option in developed countries, however, government of developing nations should repair their existing vehiclrs first.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0

You address both sides of the discussion and state a clear preference for repairing existing transport, especially in developing countries. The examples of railway investment in Japan and China and bus safety problems in Pakistan, India and Bangladesh are relevant. However, the first view is mainly explained through national development and appearance, rather than the practical benefits of very fast intercity trains, such as shorter journeys or stronger links between cities. Your opinion also becomes conditional in the conclusion: you support railway investment in developed countries but prioritise repairs in developing ones. Explain this distinction more fully and develop the benefits and drawbacks of each option to make the response more balanced and convincing.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0

The response has a clear overall structure: an introduction, one paragraph for each view, and a conclusion. The contrast between developed and developing countries gives the discussion a recognisable progression, and examples generally appear alongside the points they support. Some connections are mechanical or unclear, however. The opening uses “Whereas” as a sentence fragment, and “Both views are acceptable” does not clearly lead into the more qualified position in the conclusion. The final paragraph also introduces a distinction between countries that could be signposted earlier. Use clearer topic sentences and linking phrases to show how each example supports the argument, while avoiding abrupt transitions.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

You use a relevant range of transport and development vocabulary, including “railway networking system,” “public transport,” “investing,” and “developing nations.” These choices make the topic clear, and some attempts at more specific language are useful. However, inaccurate word choice, collocation and spelling are noticeable: “trails” for “trains,” “archichectures,” “break failure,” and “vehiclrs” reduce precision. Phrases such as “already present public vehicles” and “a very huge railway system” are also unnatural or repetitive. Build accuracy by learning common transport collocations and checking spelling, and choose more precise terms such as “existing public transport” and “brake failure.”

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5

You attempt both simple and complex sentence forms, including a contrast between the two views and clauses explaining transport problems. Meaning is generally understandable, but some grammatical errors recur. For example, “It a common trend” is missing a verb, “government spent” has an inconsistent verb form, and “Japan and China has” does not agree with its plural subject. Articles and sentence boundaries also need attention: “a worst option” and the opening fragment beginning “Whereas” are examples. Practise checking subject–verb agreement, verb forms and articles, and make sure each sentence has a complete main clause. More accurate control of these structures would make your argument easier to follow.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.