Band 5.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.0 · Cambridge IELTS 12 · 2026-11-03

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

In a number of countries, some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities. Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport.

Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

 

Student answer (Band 5.0)

In many countries some individuals believe that investing more money in building new railway lines are important to make traveling more faster while other think spending money to enhance the existing transport system .

From my prospective , Spending money on Constructing new transport system and railway lines are more effective and more helpful for public. As we know technology are making more and more faster train than the existing once which make traveling more easy and time saving you can reach from one place to another in a ver short interval of time .

While , On existing transport system it is also important that improving and enhace them between some time because they are also useful for some people , thise. who scare from high speed train they use the previous existing once . They are also need a proper servicing and care for long use .

Government should need to build new railway lines and transport system and invest hugh amount on constructing them and they should also put some money on improving the existing systems because they are also for public service they also need proper guidance.

In conclusion , both ideas are good but for me constructing new railway lines are more good idea then the other one .

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.0

You address both views and give a clear preference for constructing new railway lines, especially in the opening and conclusion. You also acknowledge that existing services need maintenance and remain useful to some passengers. However, the discussion is only partial: the benefits of high-speed rail are asserted rather than explained with a specific example, and the opposing view is briefly described without showing why investment in current transport might be preferable. The recommendation that governments fund both options also makes your preference less fully reasoned. The response is below the required 250 words, which limits the space available to develop and support your ideas. Explain the trade-offs and add a relevant example to make your position more convincing.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.5

The response has a recognisable structure: an introduction, a paragraph on existing transport, a recommendation, and a conclusion. This helps the reader identify the two views and your preference. However, progression between ideas is limited, and several points are repeated, particularly the need to build new lines and improve existing systems. Linking words such as “While” and “In conclusion” are used, but the contrast introduced by “While” is not developed smoothly, and the final recommendation appears abruptly. Some sentence boundaries and punctuation also make the flow difficult to follow. Organise the body into two clearly developed paragraphs—one for each view—and use linking phrases to show how each reason supports your argument.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

You use some relevant transport vocabulary, including “railway lines,” “high speed train,” “existing transport system,” and “servicing.” This gives the response a clear connection to the topic. However, the range is limited and several expressions are repeated, such as “spending money,” “more good idea,” and “existing.” Some word choices and collocations are inaccurate or unclear, including “traveling more faster,” “from one place to another in a very short interval,” and “they also need proper guidance.” Spelling errors such as “prospective,” “enhace,” “thise,” and “hugh” also reduce precision. Build a more varied set of topic-specific phrases and check spelling and natural word combinations.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You attempt to connect ideas in longer sentences, for example by using “while” and “because,” and the overall meaning is usually recoverable. However, the range of sentence structures is limited, and complex attempts often contain errors. In the opening, “investing more money … are important” has subject–verb disagreement, while “technology are making” repeats this problem. Other examples include “other think,” “they are also need,” and “constructing new railway lines are more good idea,” where agreement, verb forms, articles, or comparison structures are faulty. Punctuation and capitalisation are also inconsistent, with unnecessary spaces before commas and capitals mid-sentence. Practise accurate simple sentences first, then combine them using subordinate clauses while checking agreement and verb forms.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.