Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 12 · 2026-09-15

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Some people believe that allowing children to make their own choices on everyday matters (such as food, clothes and entertainment) is likely to result in a society of individuals who only think about their own wishes. Other people believe that it is important for children to make decisions about matters that affect them.

Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.5)

The ebb and flow of life alters the outlook and attitude of people altogther, and especially if this observation could be made of teenagers then its became worth seeing, a bunch argue that giving freedom of choice in daily life things can lead to self-centeredness, while others deny by saying that it is essenial for their development. This essay will analyze both these views before any conclusion could be drawn.

The utmost consideration is that, giving flexibility to juveniles in the decision of choice in everyday life can lead to selflessness. When children are constantly given the power of choice according to their preference, then they might not learn the consider to need and desire. as a result it may a lack of self-discipline, consideraion of health and may implement their own preferance on others.

The next compelling argument is that, giving the right of freedom to children in daily life needs is beneficial for building their confidence, learn about the consequences from their decisions, and to boost their decision making power. as a result they learn about resposibilities, independence in their choice and can cope with the outcome from the decision.

Moving towards remedies, the most effective way to address this issue is that, there should be limitation for the decision in daily life things for teenagers, and parents should support the right decisions made by their children and should not force their own choice on children. It may have harmful effects on their children physical and mental health.

Following the analyzation of the above points, it is crystle clear fact that giving the choice in everyday life improves children's confidence and helps in their decision making power. However, it is opined that there should be limitation in their decision.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 6.0

The response addresses all parts of the task by discussing both views on children making everyday decisions and providing a personal opinion, which aligns with the requirements of Band 6. The position is clear, although the ideas are sometimes under-developed and rely on general statements rather than deep elaboration. For instance, the discussion on self-centeredness mentions that children might 'not learn the consider to need and desire,' but this point is expressed somewhat unclearly and lacks fully extended supporting examples. While the prompt asks to discuss both views and give an opinion, the inclusion of a 'remedies' paragraph slightly disrupts the expected structure of a standard discussion essay. However, the core requirements of the task are met satisfactorily, corresponding to a Band 6 performance.

Coherence and Cohesion — Band 5.5

The essay presents a coherent overall arrangement and follows a discernible paragraph structure, including an introduction, body paragraphs, and a conclusion. However, cohesion is frequently faulty and mechanical. For example, transitional phrases like 'Moving towards remedies' and 'Following the analyzation of the above points' are unnatural and reveal an over-reliance on rigid templates. Furthermore, referencing is sometimes unclear, such as the pronoun use in 'its became worth seeing' and 'it may a lack of self-discipline.' Paragraphing is used to separate distinct ideas, but the logical progression between sentences is occasionally disrupted by grammatical fragmentation and awkward phrasing, placing this aspect of the writing firmly at Band 5.5 to 6.0. A score of 5.5 is appropriate due to the mechanical nature of the cohesive devices.

Lexical Resource — Band 5.0

The student displays an adequate range of vocabulary for the task, attempting less common items such as 'self-centeredness,' 'independence,' and 'consequences.' However, there are numerous word choice and spelling errors that detract from the overall quality, including 'altogther,' 'essenial,' 'crystle clear,' and 'resposibilities.' Phrases like 'daily life things' and 'decision of choice' demonstrate unnatural collocations and a lack of lexical precision. While the vocabulary is sufficient to convey the general meaning, the frequency of spelling mistakes and awkward phrasing prevents the response from achieving a higher band, making Band 5.0 the most accurate reflection of lexical control.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 5.0

The writer attempts a mix of simple and complex sentence forms, demonstrating some ambition in sentence structures. However, grammatical accuracy is weak, with frequent errors that occasionally impede understanding. Examples of errors include subject-verb agreement issues ('its became worth seeing'), missing auxiliary verbs ('it may a lack of'), and faulty clause structures ('When children are constantly given the power of choice... then they might not learn'). Punctuation is also problematic, with lowercase letters starting sentences after periods and comma splices. Because the attempts at complex sentences are frequently faulty and errors are persistent throughout the text, the performance aligns with Band 5.0.

See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.