Band 5.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.0 · Cambridge IELTS 12 · 2026-09-24

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Some people believe that allowing children to make their own choices on everyday matters (such as food, clothes and entertainment) is likely to result in a society of individuals who only think about their own wishes. Other people believe that it is important for children to make decisions about matters that affect them.

Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.0)

A few section of society reveals that, we should be given to children free of hand to take decisions in their daily purposes of life such as entertainment ,food and for buy cloths.While the other people believes that we should not give all the right to make their decision in life and we should give them responsibilities which they effect on them.The result will be the wishes of their parents.

On one hand,children plays a significant role of to build the nation and society if we give them a suitable environment. Everyone loves their child and want to see their future bright.Childs have had a powerful memory to learn new technalogy and instruments. we should provide a suitable service and we give them freedom to take and participate in their daily lives .In that way,their confidence will boost and their interest will be sown easily.For example in Japan the institutions and basic schools give children freedom of choice to select their own careers of life.The result shows when they grows and invented new discoveries for their own knowledge who gained their basic academy.

On the other hand, childs do not have enough knowledge about their daily matters which they effect on them.We should provide them exact solutions and how to dealt with them.If they cope with their serious issues ,the maturity and sense of thinking will be come automatically. In that way,they can handle and deal everything which they involve.For instance,my friend Abid whose have all the rights to take their decision of life and being freedom of their choice handeled them in a very easy way and people look down upon him.

In conclusion, we should not give all the right to take decisions the result will be show in a waiste of money .Further steps taken to hanndle their situations.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.0

The response addresses both views outlined in the prompt regarding children making everyday choices and discusses the potential consequences of such autonomy versus parental guidance. A personal position is attempted, though it is somewhat muddled due to language barriers. The writer covers all parts of the task, attempting to present arguments for both sides, such as fostering confidence versus ensuring proper direction in daily matters. However, the ideas are underdeveloped and lack sufficient supporting evidence or clear extension. Phrases such as 'In conclusion, we should not give all the right to take decisions the result will be show in a waiste of money' demonstrate confusion in argument formulation. Consequently, the task response aligns best with Band 5 descriptors, where the task is addressed only partially and ideas remain somewhat limited and under-developed.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.0

The response is divided into four paragraphs, reflecting an attempt at proper structure for an essay. However, the logical progression is frequently disrupted by awkward transitions, run-on sentences, and abrupt shifts in focus. Cohesive devices are either missing, inadequate, or misused, resulting in mechanical and disjointed links between sentences. For instance, transitional phrases like 'On one hand' and 'On the other hand' are employed, but the internal cohesion within paragraphs suffers from unclear referencing and poor sentence construction, such as 'For instance,my friend Abid whose have all the rights to take their decision of life and being freedom of their choice handeled them in a very easy way'. Paragraphing is visible, but the overall progression lacks clarity. This places the response firmly at Band 5 for coherence and cohesion due to the presence of some organisation without a clear, smooth overall progression.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

The vocabulary used is very limited and basic, restricting the writer's ability to convey precise meanings. There are frequent word choice and collocation errors throughout the essay, such as 'free of hand', 'daily purposes of life', 'buy cloths', 'sown easily', and 'waiste of money'. Spelling errors also occur, such as 'technalogy' and 'hanndle'. Attempts to use less common vocabulary fail due to inaccuracies in form and meaning, which occasionally impedes the reader's understanding. Because the lexical range is narrow and noticeable errors cause difficulty for the reader, the writing corresponds directly to Band 5 descriptors for lexical resource.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 4.0

The writer attempts a mix of simple and complex sentence structures, but complex sentences are frequently faulty and fraught with basic grammatical errors. There are persistent issues with subject-verb agreement, pronoun usage, prepositions, and verb tenses, as seen in sentences like 'A few section of society reveals that, we should be given to children free of hand' and 'Childs have had a powerful memory'. Punctuation is also poorly handled, with irregular spacing around commas and periods. These frequent errors cause significant difficulty for the reader and obscure the intended meaning of many sentences. Therefore, the grammatical performance fits the Band 4 descriptor profile, characterised by very limited structures and frequent errors that frequently distort meaning.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.