Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 12 · 2026-10-23
IELTS Writing Task 2 question
Some people believe that allowing children to make their own choices on everyday matters (such as food, clothes and entertainment) is likely to result in a society of individuals who only think about their own wishes. Other people believe that it is important for children to make decisions about matters that affect them.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Student answer (Band 6.0)
Some people argue that if young minds are allowed to decide about basic things like food, clothes and entertainment for themselves on their own, will result in a society where everyone would only think about himself. However, their counterpart discuss that they ought to be allowed to opt themselves pertaining to the matters that have consequences over them.
It is a common truth that the children do not comprehend the advantages and disadvantages regarding particular things. For instance, they do not know much about nutrients in a balanced diet or the importance of a healthy food for them.This clearly demonstrates that they need assistance by their parents in selecting what they should eat. Moreover, If children are provided with ample amount of freedom, they would prefer entertainment over everything else making them less anxious about their future goals and acheivements. This also signifies the importance of the guidance given by parents in daily life works. If the children are set free in deciding these tiny matters for them, then in future they will also want freedom in selecting everything for them. This will produce a society where everyone will be selfish and the true essence of a society which is mutual co-operation and co-oridination will vanish.
On the other hand, many people raise concerns over the freedom of children. They argue that the youth should opt for the things themselves that matter them the most. In accordance with their point of view, humans are born free and should not be bounded by the decisions which are made for them by other people. They say if the youngestors would be allowed to decide for them, it will create a sense of responsibility in them at an early age. For them, humans learn from mistakes, if the decision made by them goes wrong in any sense, they will acquire knowledge about that matter and in future, it is less likely that they repeat the same mistake.
In a nutshell, the freedom of decision for a child is generally debated all across the globe. From my perspective, i believe that children should be set free in their matters as it will result in a responsible and well-awared society. The parents should educate the children about the significance of co-operation in a society. This will generate optimistic minds which will prove to be beneficial for society.
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 6.5 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 6.5 |
| Lexical Resource | 5.5 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 5.5 |
| Overall | 6.0 |
Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.5
You address both views and give a clear personal position: you first explain why parental guidance may prevent self-centred behaviour, then present the case for children making choices, and conclude that they should have freedom supported by parental education. The discussion is relevant, and the examples about diet, entertainment and learning from mistakes help illustrate the arguments. However, the two sides are not developed equally: the first is extended into a prediction about society, while the benefits of children’s choices are explained more briefly and generally. The claim that freedom over small decisions will lead to selfishness also needs clearer reasoning or evidence. To strengthen the response, develop specific examples on both sides and explain how children can gain autonomy without neglecting cooperation.
Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.5
The response has a coherent overall structure, with an introduction, separate paragraphs for the opposing views, and a conclusion that states your opinion. Signposting such as “On the other hand” and “In a nutshell” makes the broad progression easy to follow. Within paragraphs, however, connections can feel mechanical, particularly through repeated “This” and “If” openings. Some references are also unclear: in “they ought to be allowed to opt themselves,” it is not immediately clear what choices are meant, and “for them” is repeated without a precise referent. The first body paragraph moves from diet to entertainment and then to future selfishness without fully explaining each link. Use more varied transitions and make the relationship between each claim and its supporting explanation explicit.
Lexical Resource: Band 5.5
You attempt a range of topic-related vocabulary, including “balanced diet,” “sense of responsibility,” “mutual co-operation” and “consequences.” This helps you discuss both parental guidance and children’s independence. However, several word choices and collocations are noticeably inaccurate or unnatural, which limits precision: “opt themselves,” “ample amount of freedom,” “daily life works,” and “well-awared society” do not express the intended meanings naturally. There are also spelling errors, including “acheivements,” “co-oridination” and “youngestors.” Aim for accurate, natural phrases rather than formal-sounding expressions, and check spelling carefully. For example, use “make their own choices,” “a great deal of freedom,” and “well-informed society.”
Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5
You use both simple and complex sentence forms, including conditional structures such as “If children are provided with ample amount of freedom, they would prefer…” and a relative clause in “the decisions which are made for them.” The overall meaning is generally understandable, but some grammatical errors recur and occasionally make sentences awkward. The opening sentence lacks a clear main clause after “if young minds are allowed…,” while “their counterpart discuss” has a subject–verb agreement error. Other examples include “the children do not comprehend” where the article is unnecessary in a general statement, and “the things themselves that matter them the most,” which has an incorrect grammatical pattern. Review clause construction, agreement, articles and verb patterns, then proofread punctuation and capitalisation, including the lowercase “i” in the conclusion.
See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.