Band 5.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.0 · IELTS Predictions Nov 2026 · 2026-11-10

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

The question “Should full time education become mandatory for children until the age of 18 years?” is being debated in many places. Some people argue that all young people should continue their studies until they reach this age.

To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.0)

Education has many forms. It can be academic, vocational, or technical. All these types of education require a person to study for some years or even lifelong. The first eighteen years are surely more important. therefore, I agree with the point that all children should get the opportunity to study and this should be considered everyone's basic right. Education is declared as basic human right in charter of human rights.

A child must be sent to school for study. Different countries have various education systems. Some focus more on improving students' cognition through education, while others concentrate more on learning new concepts and recalling them. Both kind of education systems have their own pros and cons but they direct the students towards learning.

Whichever, education system you opt for your children, be consistent in sending them to study institutions. One should not skip years of child education atleast until he/she is 18 years old. These years are important in creating a child future. Also, this is a time when your potentials is high and you have more capabilities to learn and practice new things. s

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 4.5

Your position is broadly clear: you support education continuing until 18, and you mention its importance for children’s development and learning. However, the response only partially addresses the question because it does not explain why education should be compulsory, or consider the implications of making it mandatory rather than simply giving children an opportunity to study. The points about different education systems are relevant but remain general and are not supported with a specific example. The response is also 65 words below the required minimum, which limits the space available to develop reasons and examples. To strengthen the argument, explain the benefits of compulsory education and address a possible drawback or opposing view before reaffirming your position.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.5

The response has a recognisable structure, with an introduction followed by paragraphs about education systems and the importance of continuing study. Ideas are generally understandable, and phrases such as “Both kind of education systems” help connect related points. However, progression is limited: the second paragraph describes different systems without clearly showing how this supports your argument about compulsory education, and the final paragraph repeats the recommendation to keep children in education. Some linking is awkward, particularly “Whichever, education system you opt for,” and the isolated final “s” disrupts the ending. Organise each body paragraph around one distinct reason, then use a concluding sentence to bring the argument together.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

You use some topic-related vocabulary, including “academic,” “vocational,” “technical,” “cognition,” and “basic human right,” which gives the response a suitable educational focus. There is also some attempt to express abstract ideas, such as the role of education in shaping a child’s future. However, the range is limited and several phrases are imprecise or unnatural, including “study institutions,” “creating a child future,” and “your potentials is high.” These choices sometimes make the intended meaning less clear. Aim for more accurate collocations and avoid repeating general terms such as “education” and “study.” For example, use “educational institutions,” “shaping a child’s future,” and “learning capacity” where appropriate.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You use mostly simple sentence patterns, with some attempts at more complex structures, such as “Some focus more on improving students’ cognition through education, while others concentrate…” This shows an effort to compare ideas, but the range remains limited and errors occur in both sentence construction and agreement. For example, “Both kind of education systems” needs plural agreement, while “your potentials is high” has a subject–verb agreement problem. The opening also begins “therefore” after a full stop, so the sentence boundary and capitalization need attention. Practise combining ideas accurately and check agreement, articles, and punctuation during revision. Greater control of these basics would make your argument easier to follow.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.