Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · IELTS Predictions Nov 2026 · 2026-11-11

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

The question “Should full time education become mandatory for children until the age of 18 years?” is being debated in many places. Some people argue that all young people should continue their studies until they reach this age.

To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.5)

Some people thought that full time education should be mandatory for yougesters who are below 18 years old. In my opnion I totally agree with this view because full time education helps children to become prosperous member in sociey and helps children to change the life style of their immediate family.

The primary reason why i agree is that full time education till 18 year can help childern to strenghthen the basic foundation of academic studies. Having a good base in studies helps student to choose a better university in future. For example ,many individuals who admitted in good university are helping society as a professional member such as Doctors, Engineers, Laywers. These professions are crucial for every good society as it help public in different ways like a doctor helps pateint to cure disease, an engineer helps to build homes and modernize the society and a laywer helps to irridicate criminals in society

The second reason why o agree with children's education is that it helps poor people to become rich and uplift the living style of their family. For instance,Many middle-class family try to foucs thier childer education even sometimes they face hardship but still they concentrate on thir children's education becuase they know they can change the life stype of whole family of they help children to study during the formating years.

In conclusiuon, i totally agree with the view that education should be mandatory fro all children till 18 years year as this years are very important for making the foundation of highes students and children can help both their family and society for better growth.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0

Your position is clear from the introduction—“I totally agree”—and remains consistent in the conclusion. You give two relevant reasons: education can build an academic foundation and improve a family’s prospects, and you support these with examples of professions and families investing in children’s studies. This addresses the question, but the case for making education compulsory specifically until 18 is not fully explained. For example, the discussion of university and professional careers does not show why continued schooling should be mandatory for every young person, and the second reason is less clearly developed. To strengthen the response, explain the benefits of education through age 18 and address why this should apply even to students with different abilities or circumstances.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.5

The response has a clear overall structure: an introduction, two body paragraphs presenting separate reasons, and a conclusion. The progression from academic benefits to family benefits is easy to follow, and signposts such as “The primary reason,” “The second reason,” and “In conclusion” help the reader navigate the argument. This meets the lower-band expectations securely and shows some features of stronger organisation. However, connections within paragraphs are sometimes abrupt: the move from university admission to the value of doctors, engineers, and lawyers needs a clearer explanation, while the second body paragraph repeats the idea of improving family life without developing the link in detail. Use clearer references and connect each example explicitly to compulsory education until 18.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

You use some topic-relevant vocabulary, including “mandatory,” “academic studies,” “professional,” and “uplift the living style,” and the reader can generally understand your intended points. However, the range is limited and several spelling and word-choice errors are noticeable, such as “yougesters,” “sociey,” “strenghthen,” and “laywers.” Some combinations are also unnatural, including “prosperous member in society” and “change the life style.” These errors sometimes make the reader pause, which limits the precision of your message. Build a reliable set of education-related collocations and check spelling carefully; aim for accurate phrases such as “contribute to society,” “strengthen their academic foundations,” and “improve their family’s standard of living.”

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You attempt both simple and more complex sentence forms, including a reason clause beginning “because” and the example sentence about families who face hardship. The main ideas remain understandable, but control is inconsistent, and errors occur across sentence structures, agreement, articles, and punctuation. For example, “full time education till 18 year can help childern” has problems with the noun phrase and plural form, while “as it help public” lacks subject–verb agreement. The long sentence listing professions and their roles also needs clearer punctuation and more controlled clause structure. Practise accurate plural forms, articles, and agreement, then divide long sentences into shorter units where needed. This will make your argument easier to read while preserving structural variety.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.