Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · IELTS Predictions Nov 2026 · 2026-11-12

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

The question “Should full time education become mandatory for children until the age of 18 years?” is being debated in many places. Some people argue that all young people should continue their studies until they reach this age.

To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.5)

FULL TIME EDUCATION SHOLD BECOME MANDATORY FOR CHILD UNTIL THE AGE OF 18, YES I AM FULLY AGREE WHIT THE STATEMENT.

FIRSTLY EARLY YEARS OF LIFE IS ALL ABOUT LEARNING AND FULL TIME EDUCATION IS A BEST WAY TO LEARN. CHILDREN WHO IS GOING FULL TIME SCHOOL AND THEN COLLEGE I BELIVE MORE SINCERE. THEY HAVE A VERY CLIEAR VIEW WHAT THEY WANT TO DO IN THERE LIFE. FOR EXAMPLE THEY CHOSE THERE PATH OF LIFE EARLY AND START DOING STUDY ACCORDINGLY.

SECONDLY, MOST OF PERENT ARE WORKING NOW A DAYS, FULL TIME EDUCATION IS BEST WAY TO KEEP THERE KIDS BUSY WHILE THEY ARE BUSY IN WORKING THIS IS A FULL TIME JOB FOR KIDS ALSO TO GO TO THE SCHOOL OR COLLEGE.

ON THE OTHER HAND MANY OF THINK STUDY SHOUD NOT BE FULL TIME AFTER SOME AGE LIKE SCHOOL OR HIGH SCHOOL, BECOUSE KIDS START PLANING TO DO A PART TIME WORK AFTER ,MAY BE HIGH SCHOOL AND MOST KIDS NEED MONEY FOR THERE COLLEGE AND UNIVERSITY CLASSES. IF THE EDUCATION KEEP GOING FULL TIME TILL THE AGE OF 18 IT WILL BE VERY DIFFICULT FOR KIDS TO MAKE MONEY FOR FULLFILL THERE DREAM AND THEY CANNOT ACHIVE WHAT THEY ACTUALLY WANT TO ACHIVE.

AT THE END I WOULD LIKE TO SAY THE ARGUMENT IS VERY MUCH STRONGE FOR BOTH OF THE SIDES KIDS WHO HAVE SPOTTING PARENTS AND ECONOMICILE STRONGE CAN AFFORD FULL TIME EDUCATION BUT WHO DONT HAVE THEY NEED TIME TO MAKE MONEY FOR EVERYTHING.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.5

Your position is clear from the opening: you fully agree that education should be compulsory until 18, and you give relevant reasons about learning, future plans and parents’ work. You also acknowledge the opposing view that young people may need to earn money, so the response engages with both sides of the debate. However, the support is limited and some points are unclear or insufficiently explained. For example, saying that school keeps children busy while parents work does not fully show why education should be mandatory, and the final point about families’ financial circumstances is difficult to follow. Develop each reason with a clearer explanation or a specific example, and make the conclusion state more directly how you weigh the financial concern against your agreement.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.5

The response has a recognisable structure: an opening position, two supporting points, a paragraph presenting a counterargument, and a concluding statement. Sequencing words such as “Firstly,” “Secondly,” and “On the other hand” help signal the direction of the discussion. However, progression is not consistently clear because several ideas are crowded into long sentences, and links between claims are sometimes weak. The paragraph about part-time work moves from earning money to fulfilling dreams without explaining the connection, while the final sentence combines parental support and economic circumstances in a confusing way. Use clearer topic sentences, separate distinct ideas, and make each paragraph’s final sentence show how its point supports or challenges your position.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

You use a small range of relevant vocabulary, including “mandatory,” “full time education,” “part-time work,” and “college and university,” which makes the topic identifiable. However, vocabulary is limited and repeated, particularly around “full time education,” “kids,” and “study.” Numerous spelling errors and inaccurate word choices also make parts harder to understand, such as “sincere” where you appear to mean committed, and “spotting parents” where the intended phrase is unclear. Work on accurate spelling and natural collocations, and choose more precise terms for young people and financial needs. A broader set of expressions for compulsory schooling, career planning, and household income would help you explain your ideas more clearly.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You attempt both simple statements and longer sentences, including a conditional idea about what may happen if education continues until 18. However, the range of structures is limited, and errors are frequent enough to make some sentences difficult to follow. Examples include “Early years of life is” instead of a plural subject with a matching verb, “Children who is going” instead of a plural verb, and “If the education keep going” instead of a correctly formed conditional clause. Articles, plurals, and sentence boundaries also need attention; for instance, the sentence beginning “Secondly” runs several ideas together. Practise subject–verb agreement and build longer sentences from accurate clauses, using full stops to separate complete ideas.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.