Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · IELTS Predictions Nov 2026 · 2026-11-13

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

The question “Should full time education become mandatory for children until the age of 18 years?” is being debated in many places. Some people argue that all young people should continue their studies until they reach this age.

To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 6.0)

In many regions, some people are believing that children should stay until they reach of legal are 18. I largely agree with this statement due to the fact that children are not capable of making mature decisions and the education can improve employment prospects after post study in the real world, although it could limit exposure to the world.

on the one hand, The pupils should be in school because they are not mature enough to make reliable decisions.

This could result in them making bad decisions or end up addicted to bad habits like drugs, alcohol and smoking. So it is important to keep teenagers in schools. Furthermore, the education enhances employment prospects in the future. With employment they may be able to improve their standard of living. without a proper education children could end up on blue collar jobs, which are and could be dangerous sometimes. For example, the students who drop out of college without completing their degree in the uk are more likely to end up homeless or more prone to crimes. It is crucial to keep children in school until they come of age and able to make reasonable decisions in life.

on the other hand, being in the school until they reach a certain age could limit their possibility of exposure to the world. It could affect their soft skills such as communication, leadership or teamwork, which could limit their career growth. For instance, the children may not be able to communicate or work together in a group, which cound decrease the productivity

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0

Your position is clear: you largely support keeping young people in education until 18, while acknowledging a possible disadvantage. You give relevant reasons about maturity and future employment, and the examples of risky habits and employment prospects help explain your view. However, the support is uneven. The claim that school prevents harmful decisions is asserted rather than explained, and the UK example about students who leave college is not clearly linked to compulsory education up to 18. The opposing point about limited exposure and soft skills is introduced but not developed or answered, and the response ends before completing that example. Develop each main idea with a clear explanation and a relevant example, then show why your overall position remains stronger.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0

The response has a recognisable overall structure: an introduction, a paragraph supporting your view, and a paragraph presenting a counterargument. Linking phrases such as “Furthermore,” “For example,” and “on the other hand” help signal relationships between ideas. However, progression within paragraphs is sometimes mechanical, with several claims joined by “So” or “Furthermore” rather than developed step by step. Some connections are also unclear: the example about leaving college and homelessness does not clearly follow from the point about school attendance, and the final paragraph stops while explaining its example. Use clearer topic sentences, connect each example explicitly to its claim, and finish with a conclusion that restates your position. Consistent paragraphing and capitalization would also make the organisation easier to follow.

Lexical Resource: Band 6.0

You use an adequate range of vocabulary for the topic, including “employment prospects,” “standard of living,” “soft skills,” and “career growth.” These choices allow you to discuss both benefits and drawbacks of continued education. There are also attempts at more specific expressions, such as “blue collar jobs,” though the phrase is not well integrated into the argument and the claim that such work is necessarily dangerous is too broad. Some word choices and collocations are inaccurate or awkward, including “reach of legal are 18,” “after post study,” and “possibility of exposure.” Spelling errors such as “cound” also reduce accuracy. Aim for natural, precise combinations and check spelling; for example, use “reach the age of 18” and “gain exposure to the wider world.”

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5

You attempt both simple and complex sentence forms, including a concession in the introduction (“although it could limit exposure”) and a relative clause in “students who drop out of college.” This shows some range, and the main ideas are generally understandable. However, some errors in sentence structure, verb forms, articles, and punctuation remain. For example, “some people are believing” would be more naturally expressed as “some people believe,” while “children should stay until they reach of legal are 18” has an unclear grammatical structure. Capitalization is inconsistent at the starts of paragraphs and sentences, and the final sentence is incomplete. Practise accurate clause construction and proofread each sentence for a complete subject–verb structure, correct articles, and sentence-ending punctuation.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.