Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · IELTS Predictions Nov 2026 · 2026-11-03

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

The question “Should full time education become mandatory for children until the age of 18 years?” is being debated in many places. Some people argue that all young people should continue their studies until they reach this age.

To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.5)

Nowadays, education is plays a significant role in the human lives. Some people believe that all the young people should must be learn education at least when they reach the 18-years age. I strongly agree with this view that all children includ young people should full time education until they age of 18-year. Because it can improve children learning skills and they can quickly achieve their life goals.

The first main reason is that why I strongly agree with this view is that it can improve and increase children learning abilities. If children start to learning at their early age then they easly learn and find the difference between the right and wrong ways. Moreover, majority of studies illustrate that who children they continue their studies until they reach the age of 18- age, they level of learning was higher than who young people did not learn properly until they reach the 18- years and also this people feel difficults to find the right and wrong ways because they education or learning abilities did not increase. That is reason, I prefer that should bi learn at least they each this age.

The second main reason is that qucikly success. Since, when they leaning level and experience of learning then they quickly achieve their life goals and make become a successfull person in his life. This chilfdren have a strong problem and solution skills, though the 18-year education they can learn proper solving skills though this period. Furthermore, They face many problem in their learning period and also they can find the solution in their academy time line, so though the experience and proper education children can make a successful person.

In conclusion, improve children leaning skills and abilities and they can achieve their life goals with the short of time is a main reason is that why I strongly believe that children should learn education until they reach this age such as 18-years ago.

AI examiner evaluation

CriterionBand
Task Achievement / Task Response5.5
Coherence and Cohesion5.5
Lexical Resource5.0
Grammatical Range and Accuracy5.0
Overall5.5

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.5

Your position is clear: you strongly agree that young people should remain in full-time education until 18, and you give two relevant reasons—improved learning abilities and better preparation for achieving life goals. These points address the question, but the response only partly develops them. For example, the claim that education helps children distinguish right from wrong is not clearly connected to compulsory schooling until 18, and the reference to studies gives no specific evidence or example. The second reason repeats the idea of success without explaining how continued education leads to particular goals or opportunities. To strengthen the response, explain each reason with a concrete example and clarify why education must continue to this age rather than simply begin early.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.5

The response has a recognisable structure: an introduction, two body paragraphs presenting separate reasons, and a conclusion. Phrases such as “The first main reason” and “The second main reason” help signal the organisation. However, progression within paragraphs is often difficult to follow because ideas are repeated or linked unclearly. In the first body paragraph, the discussion moves from learning abilities to right and wrong, then to an unclear comparison between students and non-students. The second paragraph similarly repeats the connection between education and success. Some linking expressions, including “Since,” “though,” and “Furthermore,” do not show the intended relationship accurately. Use clearer topic sentences, develop one point at a time, and make references such as “this people” or “this age” precise.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

You use some relevant vocabulary for the topic, including “learning abilities,” “life goals,” “problem and solution skills,” and “education.” However, the range is limited and key words are repeated frequently, especially “learn,” “education,” “children,” and “success.” Several word choices or collocations make the meaning unclear, such as “learn education,” “quickly success,” and “make become a successful person.” There are also noticeable spelling and word-form errors, including “easly,” “qucikly,” “successfull,” and “chilfdren.” These issues sometimes make the reader work to understand your point. Build a wider set of accurate phrases for discussing educational outcomes, and check spelling and collocations when revising.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You attempt both simple and more complex sentences, including conditional and subordinate clauses, as in “If children start to learning at their early age then…” and “Since, when they leaning level…”. However, these longer structures are often faulty, and frequent errors can make the message difficult to follow. Examples include “education is plays,” “should must be learn,” “they age of 18-year,” and “they level of learning was higher.” Subject–verb agreement, verb forms, articles, and sentence construction need more consistent control. Some sentences also contain several clauses without clear grammatical links. Practise building accurate simple sentences first, then add one subordinate clause at a time; check verb forms and agreement, for example, “children should study” and “their learning level is higher.”

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.