Band 7.0 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 7.0 · Recent IELTS Exams (Canada & India) · 2026-07-31

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

You recently helped your company organise an event at a hotel. Write a letter to the hotel manager. In your letter:

– Provide details about the event
– Mention what you particularly liked about the hotel
– Suggest areas for improvement.

You do NOT need to write any addresses.

Begin your letter as follows:
Dear Sir / Madam,

Student answer (Band 7.0)

Dear Sir/Madam,

I would like to appreciate the hard work you put in organising the Christmas party for my organisation. I know, it was on a short notice but still you managed to do that. Although everything about the celebration was perfect, I just want to point out one thing that was the vegetarian food options.

To commence with the positives, the decoration was apt. The flowers and lightening were in coordination and were complementing each other very well. What’s more, the food was delicious especially the ham sandwiches.

On the contrary, there was just one drawback of the event that was the vegetarian options. Even after being told about the food choices of staff, there were no much veg choices. Only fruits and juices were available. Additionally, the food was served cold because of the confusion on serving time which didn’t justify with the taste. I recommend you to cross check the serving time with your chefs to reduce misunderstandings next time.

I hope you will find my feedback beneficial!

Yours sincerely,

Komal

AI examiner evaluation

CriterionBand
Task Achievement / Task Response7.5
Coherence and Cohesion7.5
Lexical Resource6.5
Grammatical Range and Accuracy6.5
Overall7.0

Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 7.5

The letter addresses all three bullet points: providing event details, mentioning positive aspects, and suggesting improvements. The tone is appropriate for a formal letter to a manager. However, the development of ideas is slightly uneven. While the positive aspects are mentioned, the description of the event itself is quite brief. The criticism regarding the vegetarian options is clear, but the explanation of the 'confusion on serving time' could have been more explicitly linked to the event's overall flow to provide a more comprehensive picture. Overall, the response fulfills the requirements of the task effectively.

Coherence and Cohesion — Band 7.5

The letter is logically organized with a clear introduction, body paragraphs, and a closing. Paragraphing is used effectively to separate the positives from the areas for improvement. Cohesive devices such as 'To commence with', 'What’s more', and 'On the contrary' are used to guide the reader through the text. While some transitions are slightly mechanical, the progression of ideas is clear throughout. The referencing is generally accurate, and the letter maintains a consistent focus on the purpose of the communication.

Lexical Resource — Band 6.5

The vocabulary is adequate for the task, allowing for clear communication. There are some successful attempts at using more specific vocabulary, such as 'apt' and 'coordination'. However, there are some minor inaccuracies in word choice and collocation, such as 'lightening' (which should be 'lighting') and 'didn’t justify with the taste' (which is non-standard phrasing). The range is sufficient to convey the intended meaning, but it lacks the precision and flexibility required for a higher band score.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 6.5

The letter uses a mix of simple and complex sentence structures. There are several grammatical errors, such as 'I know, it was on a short notice' (should be 'at short notice') and 'there were no much veg choices' (should be 'not many'). Additionally, the sentence 'I recommend you to cross check' is slightly awkward; 'I recommend that you cross-check' would be more natural. While these errors are present, they do not impede the reader's understanding of the message. The punctuation is generally functional.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.