Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Recent IELTS Exams (Canada & India) · 2026-08-12
IELTS Writing Task 1 question
You recently helped your company organise an event at a hotel. Write a letter to the hotel manager. In your letter:
– Provide details about the event
– Mention what you particularly liked about the hotel
– Suggest areas for improvement.You do NOT need to write any addresses.
Begin your letter as follows:
Dear Sir / Madam,
Student answer (Band 6.0)
Dear Sir/ Madam,
I am writing this letter to you about your hotel that what I liked in your hotel along with the areas which needs to be improved. I am working at Sunshine company. We visited last week at your hotel for our birthday party celebration.
To begin with, the event was on 15th August in the banquet hall in the evening. The party was joined by 150 people to celebrate our owner's birthday.
The areas liked by my team members was service of your staff as it was frequent and they were really cooperative. On the downside, some areas still needs to be improved such as food quality. we chose your location because we were expecting of best quality food, but the food was not that much fresh. Hence, it could be improved by hiring professional chefs.
I hope to enjoy our next visit with high-quality food.
Yours Sincerely,
Manpreet Kaur
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 6.0 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 6.0 |
| Lexical Resource | 6.0 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 5.5 |
| Overall | 6.0 |
Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 6.0
The letter addresses all three bullet points: providing event details, mentioning positive aspects, and suggesting improvements. The tone is appropriate for a formal letter. However, the development of ideas is somewhat limited. For instance, the suggestion for improvement is brief, and the description of the event could be more detailed to fully satisfy the 'well-developed' requirement of higher bands. The purpose of the letter is clear from the beginning, and the reader is left with a good understanding of the situation, though the response stays close to the minimum requirements.
Coherence and Cohesion — Band 6.0
The letter is logically organized with a clear introduction, body paragraphs, and a closing. Paragraphing is used to separate the different requirements of the task. However, the use of cohesive devices is somewhat mechanical and limited (e.g., 'To begin with', 'On the downside', 'Hence'). There is some repetition in sentence structure, and the flow between ideas could be smoother. While the overall arrangement is coherent, the lack of variety in linking words and occasional awkward phrasing prevents it from reaching a higher band.
Lexical Resource — Band 6.0
The vocabulary is adequate for the task, allowing the writer to communicate their message clearly. There are some attempts at more specific vocabulary, such as 'banquet hall' and 'cooperative', which are appropriate. However, the range is limited, and there are some inaccuracies in word choice and collocation, such as 'expecting of best quality food' (should be 'expecting the best quality food') and 'not that much fresh'. The vocabulary is sufficient to convey the intended meaning but lacks the flexibility and precision required for higher bands.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 5.5
The letter contains a mix of simple and complex sentence structures. There are several grammatical errors, such as 'what I liked in your hotel along with the areas which needs to be improved' (subject-verb agreement error) and 'The areas liked by my team members was service' (should be 'were the service'). While these errors are noticeable, they do not impede communication. The writer demonstrates a basic control of grammar, but the frequency of errors in subject-verb agreement and article usage keeps the score at this level.
See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.