Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · IELTS Predictions Nov 2026 · 2026-11-09

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Some people believe the government should make fruit and vegetables cheaper. Others think it should put a tax on unhealthy food.

Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 6.0)

People have different views regarding prices of fruit and vegetables that these should be available at cheap prices, while others believe that unhealthy food must be available at higher prices including tax. Although both perspectives have their own merits, I believe that availability of fruits and vegetables at lower prices could make it easier to get by poor people, and so to maitain a healthy life rather than having unhealthy food. This essay willl explain both views before explaining why government should make lower prices.

On the one hand, many people believe that government should put tax on the prices of unhealthy food because in this way such food could affect our health badly. This is mainly because if the unhealthy food will be cheaper, more people would intend to buy it rather than cooking healthy meals at home, which can lead to trend of more fast food like burgers, pizza or pasta not good for our health. In other words more taxes on unhealthy food could prevent habit of buying it on regular basis and ultimately less cases of illness due to unhygienic food consumption.

On the other hand, others argue that government should make it possible that everyone get fruits and vegetables at affordable prices since these are an essential part of having a balanced diet and are more nutritious. Although the previous argument may be valid to some extent, I believe that children should be habitual of eating fruits and vegetables at an early age, only then they could develop healthy eating habits rather eating unhygienic food from restaurants. Moreover, only government's policies could make it possible to provide everyone healthy food.

In conclusion, while some people support the idea thst unhealthy food should be sell with heavy taxes, I belive that government should keep a check on prices of fruits and vegetables so to provide it at affordable price to every class whether it is poor , middle or elite. Together we can make a healt

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0

You address both views and make your own position clear: you support making fruit and vegetables affordable, while also explaining why some people favour taxing unhealthy food. The points about affordability for poorer people and children developing healthy habits are relevant to the question. However, the two sides are not developed equally. The tax argument is explained through a possible shift towards fast food and illness, but the link between taxation and healthier choices could be made more precise. Your support for lower prices is also asserted rather than demonstrated; for example, explain how subsidies or lower prices would help families choose nutritious food. The conclusion restates your view, but its final thought is incomplete, so the response does not fully round off the argument.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0

The response has a clear overall structure: an introduction, separate paragraphs for the two views, and a conclusion. Signposting such as “On the one hand,” “On the other hand,” and “In conclusion” helps readers follow the discussion. Within paragraphs, however, some connections are mechanical or unclear. For instance, “Although the previous argument may be valid to some extent” does not clearly explain how the point about children’s habits answers the tax argument. The opening sentence is also difficult to follow because it combines the two positions in an awkward structure. Improve progression by giving each paragraph a clear main claim, then explaining and illustrating it before moving to the next point. The unfinished final sentence weakens the conclusion’s cohesion.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

You use a relevant range of topic vocabulary, including “balanced diet,” “nutritious,” “affordable prices,” and “healthy eating habits,” which allows you to discuss the issue clearly. There are also attempts at more formal phrasing, such as “both perspectives have their own merits.” However, several word choices and collocations are inaccurate or unnatural, including “get by poor people,” “intend to buy it,” and “less cases of illness.” Spelling errors such as “maitain,” “willl,” “thst,” and “belive” also reduce accuracy. Aim for more natural combinations and check spelling carefully; for example, use “affordable for low-income families,” “be more likely to buy it,” and “fewer cases of illness.”

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5

You attempt a mix of simple and complex sentence forms, including conditional clauses (“if the unhealthy food will be cheaper”) and concessive structures (“Although the previous argument may be valid…”). The overall meaning is generally understandable, but some grammatical errors affect clarity. In the conditional, use “if unhealthy food is cheaper, more people may buy it”; the original combines an unsuitable future form with the conditional. There are also agreement and article problems in “everyone get fruits” and “less cases,” as well as an incomplete final sentence. Some long sentences combine several ideas without clear punctuation, particularly in the first body paragraph. Practise accurate conditionals, subject–verb agreement, and sentence boundaries while retaining your attempts at complex structures.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.