Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · IELTS Predictions Nov 2026 · 2026-11-10

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Some people believe the government should make fruit and vegetables cheaper. Others think it should put a tax on unhealthy food.

Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 6.0)

NOWADAYS, UNHEALTHY FOOD IS INCREASING DAY BY DAY, AND THE NUMBER OF INDIVIDUALS PREFER TO SPEND MORE ON IT RATHER THAN HEALTHY FOOD. MANY PEOPLE BELIEVE THAT THE AUTHORITY NEEDS TO MAKE NATURAL FOOD CHEAPER AND SOME BELIEVE THAT IT SHOULD ADD TAXES ON UNHEALTHY ITEMS.I THINK ADDING A TAX ON JUNK FOOD IS A GOOD IDEA. IN THE UPCOMING PARAGRAHS I WILL DISCUSS BOTH SIDES AND MY POINT OF VIEW BECAUSE THEIR ARE FEW REASONS TO BELIEVE SO.

TO COMMENCE WITH, DECREASING THE RATE OF FRUITS AND VEGETABLES IS ENCOURAGING HUMANS TO BUY THEM. FOR EXAMPLE, IF HEALTHY FOOD PRODUCTS ARE AVAILABLE AT LOWER PRICES, THEN THE MAJORITY OF INDIVIDUALS LIKE TO SPEND THEIR MONEY. AS A RESULT, IT PROMOTES A HEALTHY LIFESTYLE AND LAYS POSITIVE IMPACT ON THEM.MOREOVER, FARMERS CAN ALSO SELL THEIR PRODUCTS IN THE MARKET. THEREFORE, THEY CAN EARN A LARGE AMOUNT OF MONEY

ON THE OTHER HAND, SOME PEOPLE BELIEVE THAT HAVING A TAX ON JUNK FOOD IS A GREAT IDEA . FOR INSTANCE, WHEN EVERYONE NOTICE THAT THEY PAY MORE AMOUNT OF TAX ON IT RATHER THAN ON THEIR FOOD, THEN THEY WOULD DEFINITELY AVOID BUYING IT AGAIN. FURTHERMORE, IT IS HELPFUL FOR THE ADMINISTRATIVE BODY AS WELL. BECAUSE WITH THE HELP OF THE TAX, THEY CAN GET MONEY WHICH THEY CAN SPEND ON PUBLIC WELFARE.

TO CONCLUDE, EVEN THOUGH MAKING FRUITS AND VEGETABLES IS CONVENIENT AND ENCOURAGES PEOPLE, I STILL BELIEVE THAT PUTTING A TAX ON UNHEALTHY FOOD HAS MORE POSITIVE POINTS AND IT HELPS SOCIETY TO MAINTAIN THEIR HEALTH.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0

You address both proposed approaches and state a clear preference for taxing unhealthy food: “I still believe that putting a tax on unhealthy food has more positive points.” The response also gives relevant reasons, including encouraging healthier choices and using tax revenue for public welfare. However, the discussion is not equally developed. The case for cheaper fruit and vegetables includes a possible benefit to farmers, but this point is not explained, while the tax argument relies mainly on the assumption that people would “definitely avoid” junk food. Develop each view with a clearer explanation or a specific example, and qualify claims where outcomes are not certain. This would make your position and supporting ideas more fully convincing.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.5

The response has a clear overall arrangement: an introduction, one paragraph for each view, and a conclusion that restates your opinion. Signposting such as “TO COMMENCE WITH,” “ON THE OTHER HAND,” and “TO CONCLUDE” helps readers follow the discussion, and the ideas generally progress logically within each paragraph. To strengthen cohesion further, avoid relying so heavily on formulaic transitions and connect claims more explicitly. For example, explain how lower prices lead to healthier choices before moving to the benefit for farmers. Some links are abrupt, such as the shift from the tax’s effect on consumers to its value for the administrative body. Clearer referencing and smoother links between related points would make the progression more natural.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

You use a range of topic-related vocabulary, including “healthy lifestyle,” “public welfare,” “tax,” and “unhealthy food,” so the main ideas are understandable. There are also attempts at more formal phrasing, such as “the administrative body.” However, several word choices and collocations are unnatural or imprecise, including “unhealthy food is increasing day by day,” “lays positive impact,” and “spend their money” where the intended meaning is unclear. Repetition of “people,” “food,” and “idea” also limits variety. Aim for accurate, natural combinations rather than formal-sounding phrases, and use precise terms such as “consumption,” “affordable,” or “revenue” where appropriate. This will improve clarity and range.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5

You attempt both simple and complex sentence forms, including conditional structures such as “if healthy food products are available at lower prices” and a concession in the conclusion beginning “even though.” The overall meaning is usually clear, but some errors in sentence structure, agreement, articles, and punctuation remain. For example, “the number of individuals prefer” needs a grammatical construction such as “the number of individuals who prefer,” and “when everyone notice” has a subject–verb agreement error. The sentence beginning “Because with the help of the tax” is also an incomplete sentence. Review agreement and sentence boundaries, and check spacing after full stops. More consistently accurate complex sentences would strengthen control.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.