Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · IELTS Predictions Nov 2026 · 2026-11-10

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Some people believe the government should make fruit and vegetables cheaper. Others think it should put a tax on unhealthy food.

Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 6.0)

In the modern era, number of individuals are taking care of their health and fitness. Few groups of people thinks that notion should reduce price of fresh fruits and vegetables. While, other group of citizens believe that increase taxes on unhealthy food. In this essay we will discuss about both views with suitable examples. I personally think that if prices will reduced of fruits that will more beneficial for our society.

To commence with, there are numerous advantages of make fruits and vegetables cheaper. First of all, fruits and vegetables are good example of healthy food. It is always helpful to fulfil key nutrients in our body. Nowadays, number of youngsters who really want to make their body fit and muscular but they are not able to buy supplements like whey protein, multivitamin tablets and many more. Number of families are not able to buy fruits because of the high price If the Government will reduced taxes or make affordable price of fruits and vegetables then it will helpful for them . Hence, it is also helpful to make healthy body, reduce risk of long term health issues and improving digestion system.

Nevertheless, another group of thinkers believe that the Government should put more taxes on unhealthy food. This is also good way to reduce demand of junk food because this type of foods put bad impact on our life such as obesity, heart problems, liver issues and many more. Nowadays, most of the children's like to eat fast food like pizza, burger etc that's why they face number of disease in younger age. For example, in Japan, The Government put more taxes on fast food items due to citizens avoid to eat junk food and they stay healthy. Therefore, if Government increase price of unhealthy food that's not a bad idea.

To conclude, I think people should focus on their health and eat healthy food like fruits and vegetables and avoid junk food like pizza, burgers. If government reduced price of fruits then its better for everyone's health and wealth.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0

You address both views and state a clear preference for making fruit and vegetables cheaper, so the response remains relevant to the task. The first main paragraph explains affordability and health benefits, while the second gives reasons for taxing unhealthy food, including possible effects on obesity and other illnesses. However, the two sides are not developed equally: the first paragraph shifts to supplements and fitness, which does not directly explain how lower produce prices would improve access for the wider population. The Japan example is also asserted rather than explained or supported. To strengthen the response, develop each policy’s likely effects with a specific, credible example and explain why your preferred approach is more effective.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.5

The essay has a clear overall structure: an introduction, one paragraph for each view, and a conclusion. Sequencing is generally easy to follow, and signposts such as “To commence with,” “Nevertheless,” and “To conclude” help identify the stages of the argument. This coherent arrangement is a strength. However, some linking is mechanical, and connections between ideas are not always smooth. For example, the discussion moves from families being unable to afford fruit to supplements and muscular bodies, then to digestion, without clearly showing how each point supports the policy. The conclusion repeats the preference but does not draw together the two arguments. Use fewer formulaic transitions and add clearer links explaining how each example supports the paragraph’s main point.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

You use enough topic-related vocabulary to communicate the main ideas, including “nutrients,” “obesity,” “heart problems,” and “long term health issues.” There are also attempts at more specific expressions, such as “reduce demand” and “put more taxes on unhealthy food.” However, word choice and collocation are often inaccurate or repetitive, which limits precision: “good example of healthy food,” “bad impact on our life,” and “number of disease” are not natural formulations. Repeated use of “fruits,” “healthy,” and “food” also narrows the range. Build a more accurate set of collocations for public health and pricing, and check word forms and countability so your meaning sounds more natural and precise.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You attempt both simple and complex sentences, including conditional structures such as “if Government increase price of unhealthy food” and a relative clause beginning “youngsters who really want to make their body fit.” These attempts show some range, but control is inconsistent, and errors sometimes make sentences difficult to process. Examples include “Few groups of people thinks,” “if prices will reduced,” and “If the Government will reduced taxes,” where agreement and verb forms are faulty. Articles and sentence boundaries also need attention, as in “a good example” and the run-on around “high price If the Government.” Practise accurate present-tense conditionals and subject–verb agreement, and punctuate longer sentences carefully. More reliable control of these patterns would make your ideas clearer.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.