Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · IELTS Predictions Nov 2026 · 2026-11-11

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Some people believe the government should make fruit and vegetables cheaper. Others think it should put a tax on unhealthy food.

Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.5)

some people thinks that the fruits and vegetable should be cheaper but on other side some think that there should be tax on junk food. I will discuss both views in upcoming paragraphs and give my opnion.

To initiate with, Making fruits and vegetable cheaper will be affordable for everyone. People could eat more healthy food to stay away from diseases like obesity, kidney dysfunction, fatty liver and so on. To continue with my logic, eating food full of nutrition not only beneficial for physical but also for mental ability. Government should exempt some taxes from them so that individuals buy fruits and vegetables without financial hesitiation.

On the other side, people thinks that government should impose taxes on processed food, Eating unhealthy food lead a lot of health issue such as heart attack, kidney. Unhealthy food only improve taste but not nutritious appetite. To quote an ideal example, recently survey shown that most of heart attack occurs due to bad eating disorder. To control this devastation administration should put duty on it.

As per my perception, people should eat nutrients-fibre rich food. But some people cannot afford expensive fruits and veggies due to sky rocketing prices. Government should provide some relief on that kind of healthy diets.

To conclude, healthy eating will bring better results and also make our living worth-living. It happens only when if government reduce the price of fruits and vegetables and impose taxes on health risks food so that people only eat healthy food instead of taking junk food.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0

You address both proposed approaches and give a clear preference for making healthy food more affordable, while also supporting a tax on unhealthy food in the conclusion. Relevant reasons include reducing health risks and helping people who cannot afford fruit and vegetables. However, the two sides are not developed equally: the case for cheaper produce is explained more fully, whereas the tax argument relies mainly on a broad claim about health problems and an unclear survey reference. The examples of obesity and other conditions help illustrate your point, but the discussion would be stronger with a specific explanation of how a tax might change purchasing habits or fund health measures. Develop each view with a clear reason and a credible example.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0

The response has a coherent overall arrangement: an introduction, separate paragraphs for the two views, your opinion, and a conclusion. This makes the main line of discussion easy to follow. You also use signposting such as “To initiate with,” “On the other side,” and “To conclude.” At times, however, these transitions feel mechanical, and some links between ideas are unclear. For example, “To continue with my logic” does not show precisely how the next sentence develops the previous point, while “As per my perception” introduces a position that has already been stated. The conclusion repeats the main points rather than drawing them together. Use fewer formulaic transitions and connect claims through clearer cause-and-effect relationships.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

You use a relevant range of topic vocabulary, including “processed food,” “nutrition,” “obesity,” and “impose taxes,” and these choices make the subject clear. There are also attempts at less common expressions, such as “financial hesitation” and “sky rocketing prices,” but some combinations are unnatural or imprecise. “Unhealthy food only improve taste but not nutritious appetite” is difficult to interpret, and “health risks food” does not express the intended meaning naturally. Spelling and word-form slips, including “opnion,” “hesitiation,” and “nutrients-fibre rich,” also reduce accuracy. Aim for precise, natural collocations and check spelling; for instance, describe food as “nutrient-rich” and prices as “soaring.”

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You attempt both simple and more extended sentence forms, including the contrast in “But some people cannot afford expensive fruits and veggies due to sky rocketing prices.” The overall meaning is generally recoverable, but errors in agreement, articles, verb forms, and sentence boundaries occur across the response. Examples include “some people thinks,” “eating food … not only beneficial,” and “eating unhealthy food lead”; these need agreement or a linking verb. The sentence beginning “To quote an ideal example” also runs into a comma splice, and “It happens only when if” uses an incorrect construction. Practise checking each sentence for a clear subject and finite verb, and use full stops or conjunctions to join independent clauses. More accurate control of these patterns would make your ideas easier to read.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.