Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · IELTS Predictions Nov 2026 · 2026-11-13

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Some people believe the government should make fruit and vegetables cheaper. Others think it should put a tax on unhealthy food.

Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 6.0)

One school of thought thinks that higher authorities should take efforts to make healthy food such as, fruits and vegetables cheap. Whereas, Others thinking is different according to them government should apply tax on fast food. According to my persoective both points are valid and in the next paragraphs I will discuss both view points and share my position.

To begin with, people are more health conscious these days and they prefer to eat more green foods whether it is fruits or vegetables. Due to high prices some people could not afford them and they ended up eating oily and unhygenic food items. To cite an example, one of my best friends is gym freak and after his workout he used to eat full plate of fresh produce. But because of inflation, the cost of fruits and green leafy vegetables reached at clouds and now he could not afford the healthy food. This leads to poor health and well being. That is why it is government responsibility to look into this matter and take measures to reduce the amount.

On the other hand, It would be also greatful if administration arrange taxes on processed food. So that people thinks before eating it. Furthermore, Government charges will definitely decrease the production of junk food. For example, In China leafy greens are so cheap but at the same time rates of processed foods are so high. As a result, people avoid high-calorie food and give preference to nutrient-rich food and stays always young and fit. While, Indian population opt for poor nutritional food. Since, It is easy available and lower at cost. Hence, they faced lot of health issues such as, cardiac arrest, high cholestrol level and etc.

in conclusion, both view points have its own value. But according to me as a human it is our responsibility also to promote healthy food options rather than stimulate food that is poor in nutrients.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0

You address both proposed approaches and give a position: you consider both valid, then conclude that people should promote healthy options rather than encourage nutrient-poor food. The discussion of affordability is relevant, and your friend’s experience illustrates how high prices may affect food choices. However, the two views are not developed equally clearly. The tax argument would benefit from explaining how higher prices might change purchasing habits and how the revenue could support health measures. The China–India comparison is asserted rather than supported, and the conclusion shifts toward personal responsibility without clearly restating what the government should do. Develop these points and make your position consistent from introduction to conclusion.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.5

The response has a clear overall arrangement: an introduction, one paragraph for each view, and a conclusion. Signposts such as “To begin with,” “On the other hand,” and “in conclusion” help readers follow the discussion, and examples are placed alongside the relevant arguments. This meets the lower-band expectation of coherent organisation and shows some of the clearer progression associated with a stronger performance. However, several links are mechanical or unclear. For example, “Whereas” begins a fragment, and “So that” is separated from the preceding sentence even though it expresses its purpose. The movement from the China example to the comparison with India also needs a clearer explanation. Use fewer formulaic transitions and connect each example explicitly to the point it supports.

Lexical Resource: Band 6.0

You use an adequate range for the topic, including “health conscious,” “processed food,” “nutrient-rich,” “inflation,” and “high-calorie.” These choices make the main ideas understandable, and you attempt some less common expressions. At times, however, word choice and collocation are inaccurate or informal: “gym freak,” “reached at clouds,” “lower at cost,” and “stays always young and fit” do not sound natural in this context. There are also spelling errors, including “persoective,” “unhygenic,” “greatful,” and “cholestrol.” These do not prevent understanding, but they reduce precision. Choose standard academic collocations and check spelling carefully; for example, describe prices as having “risen sharply” rather than using an idiom that does not fit.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5

You attempt both simple and complex sentence forms, including clauses introduced by “because,” “while,” and “since,” and the main message is generally clear. Some errors in sentence structure, agreement, verb forms, and punctuation remain. For instance, “Whereas, Others thinking is different” is not a complete, well-formed sentence; “people thinks” should use a plural verb; and “they faced lot of health issues” has an inconsistent tense and needs an article before “lot.” The fragments “So that people…” and “Since, It is easy available…” also interrupt the sentence structure. Work on joining dependent clauses to complete sentences, maintaining consistent tense, and checking subject–verb agreement and articles. These corrections would make your varied structures more controlled.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.