Band 5.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.0 · IELTS Predictions Nov 2026 · 2026-11-14

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Some people believe the government should make fruit and vegetables cheaper. Others think it should put a tax on unhealthy food.

Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.0)

Many individual's are of the opinion that the state should make fruit and vegetables affordable, while others believe to put tax on unhealthy items. This essay will give clear view on how availability of fruit and vegetables encourage people to eat healthy and taxation on unhealthy food leads to financial burden on poor people.

The availability of fruits and vegetables makes people buy more healthy food. People may replace junk food with healthier options if the government makes easy access to the public. I believe that low-income families can buy nutritious food effortlessly. Therefore, this can reduce health problems such as obesity or diabetes in the long term. For instance, in countries where fresh produce is available at reasonable prices, people may be more likely to include salads and vegetables in their daily meals. In this way, people are more inclined to nutrient-dense food.

Imposing taxation on unhealthy eating may results in rising prices. It can cause additional financial pressure on low-income families. Some

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 4.0

You introduce both views and give a relevant reason for making produce affordable, explaining that it could help low-income families choose nutritious food and reduce health problems. However, the response does not develop the view about taxing unhealthy food: it mentions rising prices and financial pressure, but the final sentence is cut off at “Some,” so the argument and your own position are not completed. The introduction promises a clear view, yet your opinion is not stated directly or consistently. The response also contains only 164 words, below the required 250, leaving the task minimally addressed. To improve, complete both sides, state your opinion explicitly, and support each argument with a developed explanation or example.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.0

The response has a recognisable structure: an introduction is followed by a paragraph about affordable produce and then one beginning to discuss taxation. Linking expressions such as “Therefore,” “For instance,” and “In this way” help show relationships between ideas. However, the overall progression is incomplete because the second viewpoint stops abruptly at “Some,” and there is no conclusion to bring the discussion together. Some links also repeat the same general point about healthier choices without extending it. Build a complete paragraph for each view, use clear transitions between them, and finish with a short conclusion that restates your position. This would give the reader a more continuous line of argument.

Lexical Resource: Band 6.0

You use an adequate range of topic-related vocabulary, including “nutritious,” “low-income families,” “financial pressure,” “obesity,” and “nutrient-dense.” These choices make the subject clear and show attempts to use more precise language than basic everyday terms. Some expressions are less natural or imprecise, however: “availability … makes people buy more” is too definite, “unhealthy eating” does not clearly mean unhealthy food, and “easy access to the public” is awkward. “Many individual's” also has an incorrect apostrophe and form. Aim for accurate collocations and consistent terms such as “access to affordable produce” and “a tax on unhealthy foods.” The vocabulary is generally understandable, but greater precision would make the argument more fluent.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5

You attempt a mix of simple and complex sentences, including a conditional structure in “People may replace junk food … if the government makes easy access to the public” and a relative clause in “countries where fresh produce is available.” Most of the intended meaning remains understandable, but some grammatical errors are noticeable. For example, “Many individual's are” has incorrect plural punctuation, “will give clear view” is missing an article, and “may results” uses the wrong verb form. The sentence beginning “Imposing taxation …” also needs a more accurate subject–verb construction. Review articles, plural forms, and verb agreement, then proofread each sentence. Completing the unfinished final sentence would also help ensure that your structures are complete.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.