Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 6.0 · IELTS Predictions Nov 2026 · 2026-11-10
IELTS Writing Task 2 question
In many countries, more people are choosing to live alone rather than share a home.
Why is this becoming more common?
Do you think this is a positive or negative development?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Student answer (Band 6.0)
In many nations, the public prefer to stay in separate homes rather than shared households. Because more number of people have become indepedant. I do think it is a positive development because people can enjoy the privacy.
In past, many people used to live in a common household, because of lower overall salaries of individuals. But, nowadays, many individuals get higher salaries which make them independant. Therefore, they are able to afford separate homes. Based on their salary ranges, eighter they buy a new home or they rent an apartment. For example, in the Pune city many people migrate form rural areas for the high salary jobs and live in rented apartmens. They eventually end up buying a house in Pune.
In many developed countries people prefer to live seprately. One of the main reason for this is privacy. When children become adults they prefer to live alone becase privacy is important for young genration. Most of the young people have some kind of relationship and to maintain the boundries of that, adults move out of their parents house. For example, In the USA, many young couple live independantly from their parents.
However, some people believe that living in the same household is better for family bonding. But the crowded houshold often results in a conflict. Therefore to avoid such situations, people should live in independant houses and they can meet their families at the festivals or gatherings.
In conclusion, living independantly in separate home is better than choosing a shared home beause many people can afford it and It is a positive development because living seprately gives them sense of privacy.
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 6.5 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 6.5 |
| Lexical Resource | 5.5 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 5.5 |
| Overall | 6.0 |
Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.5
You address both questions and maintain a clear positive position, especially in the introduction and conclusion. The reasons you give—greater financial independence and a desire for privacy—are relevant, and the Pune and US examples help illustrate them. This meets the task well overall. However, some points are more fully explained than others: the link between higher salaries and moving out is clear, while the claim that crowded households cause conflict is asserted without an example or explanation. The discussion of relationships and privacy could also be developed further. To strengthen the response, explain how these factors affect people’s choices and support each main reason with a more specific example.
Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.5
The response has a coherent overall arrangement: it introduces the issue and position, gives reasons in separate paragraphs, considers an opposing view, and concludes consistently. Connectors such as “Therefore,” “For example,” and “However” make the relationships between ideas generally clear. The progression is strongest in the paragraph about salaries, where the explanation leads into the Pune example. At times, though, linking is mechanical or the connection between sentences is not fully clear; for instance, the move from young adults’ relationships to the US example is abrupt. Some ideas in the final body paragraph could also be connected more explicitly. Use referencing and transitions more flexibly, and make each example’s relevance to the point unmistakable.
Lexical Resource: Band 5.5
You use enough topic-related vocabulary to communicate the main ideas, including “privacy,” “salary ranges,” “migrate,” and “family bonding.” However, the range is limited and several noticeable spelling and word-choice errors reduce precision, such as “indepedant,” “apartmens,” “seprately,” and “boundries.” Some phrases are also unnatural, including “the public prefer to stay in separate homes” and “live in independant houses.” These errors do not prevent the reader from understanding your position, but they make the writing less fluent and controlled. Build a bank of accurate collocations for housing and independence, and proofread spelling and word forms carefully.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5
You use both simple sentences and some longer structures, including clauses with “because,” “when,” and “which,” so there is an attempt at variety. Most ideas remain understandable, but grammatical control is uneven. Examples include the sentence fragment “Because more number of people have become indepedant,” the missing article in “In past,” and agreement errors such as “One of the main reason.” There are also problems with sentence boundaries and punctuation, including the comma after “But” and the capitalised “It” within the conclusion. Practise forming complete sentences and checking articles, subject–verb agreement, and punctuation. More accurate complex sentences would make your explanations clearer.
See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.