Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 6.0 · IELTS Predictions Nov 2026 · 2026-11-13
IELTS Writing Task 2 question
People can find out about places beyond their own country in different ways. Some people believe it is necessary to travel to other countries to learn about them; others argue that the internet and television provide enough information.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Student answer (Band 6.0)
In contemporary society, some people believe that it is essential to visit other nations to get much information about them while other group argues that it is not necessary to visit other countries because the internet and television provide sufficient information. Getting to know about any place over internet provides an overview of that place, but visiting the place in person gives a real-life experience to make good memories with the loved ones. We will critically evaluate the both perspectives before arguing that a balance between the two is most beneficial.
On the one hand, knowing about any place gives an idea about the various aspects such as, what kind of place is this, what to visit there, and how to plan the whole itenary. Moreover, this is free of cost because a person can save a pile of money ny knowing in advance about the place that, is the place even worth visiting or are we just wasting the money. In addition, an individual can get enough knowledge about various destinations. For example, a person can get to know about any place by social media such as instagram, facebook, and youtube. This person will find it less challenging to choose between different places.
On the other hand, a person who visits a place physically can get a real-life experience, where he can enjoy with his family members. He can get to know about their local traditions, food, and the language in particular. Furthermore, he can make some international friends. For example, we all know about the pyramid of Giza, but visiting them in person give a thrilling experience.
In conclusion, getting information online about any place can provide superficial information without paying money, but visiting them give an international exposure by exchanging cultural values.
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 6.0 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 6.0 |
| Lexical Resource | 5.5 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 5.5 |
| Overall | 6.0 |
Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0
You address both views and give a clear overall position: online sources offer an overview, while travel provides direct experience, and you conclude that both have value. Relevant examples, such as learning about destinations through social media and visiting the Pyramids of Giza, support the discussion. However, the two sides are not developed equally: the benefits of online research are explained in more detail, while the travel paragraph mainly lists experiences without showing why they provide knowledge that media cannot. The conclusion also introduces “international exposure” without explaining this idea. To strengthen the response, develop each view with a specific reason and example, and make your preference for a balance more explicit throughout.
Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0
The response has a clear overall structure, with an introduction, separate paragraphs for the two views, and a conclusion. “On the one hand” and “On the other hand” help signal the contrast, and the ideas generally progress from online research to direct experience. Some connections are less smooth or precise, however. For example, “Moreover” and “In addition” add points without clearly showing how they relate, and the question “is the place even worth visiting or are we just wasting the money” interrupts the formal flow. The conclusion repeats the main contrast rather than drawing the discussion together. Use clearer links between each reason and its consequence, and ensure references such as “them” have an unmistakable antecedent.
Lexical Resource: Band 5.5
You use a reasonable range of topic vocabulary, including “real-life experience,” “local traditions,” “destinations,” and “cultural values,” which allows you to discuss both perspectives. There are also attempts at more formal phrasing, such as “critically evaluate” and “sufficient information.” However, several word choices and collocations are awkward or imprecise: “get much information,” “a pile of money,” “international exposure,” and “make good memories” do not sound natural in these contexts. Spelling errors such as “itenary” and “ny” also reduce accuracy. Aim for precise, natural combinations and check spelling carefully; this would make your ideas clearer and more convincing.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5
You use a mix of simple and complex forms, including a contrast clause in the opening and the conditional question “is the place even worth visiting.” Most sentences remain understandable, but some grammatical errors occur. For example, “other group argues” needs an article or plural form, “visiting them in person give” has a subject–verb agreement error, and “visiting them give an international exposure” repeats this problem. The phrase “how to plan the whole itenary” also has an unclear grammatical construction, while “the both perspectives” uses an incorrect determiner pattern. Review articles, agreement, and sentence construction, then proofread each sentence to catch these errors while retaining your attempts at complex structures.
See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.