Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Recent IELTS Exams (Canada & India) · 2026-11-11

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Some people believe that old buildings, such as town halls and art galleries, should be restored, even though this can be costly. Others argue that governments should replace them with new, modern buildings.

Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 6.0)

Some people think that old structures should be preserved, including town halls and art galleries. While some would argue that authorities should replace them with new buildings because of safety concerns and modern facilities. I believe that spending money on historical building can attract tourism and contribute to local economy.

On the one hand, ancient buildings can be demolished to construct new modern structures. To explain this, modern buildings have a numerous of facilities such as dishwasher, washing machine, and thermostat which provide people comfort and convenience. After long working hours individuals can complete their household chores more easily. Moreover, falling of such buildings can injure someone badly. For example, in severe weather conditions any incident can happen which can affect anyone. So, it becomes essential to knock down outdated structures for safety of community.

On the other hand, renovating and maintaining old properties can be a wise decision made by the government. To explicate this, people enjoy exploring such sites to gain knowledge about the past generations and the history of countries. As a result, this would give job opportunities to locals, and enhance the source of income. For example, Amritsar is the peak tourist attraction city in Punjab, a large number of people visit this city from all over the world to visit the Golden Temple, and other places, such as Jallanwala Bagh and the Wagah border, and locals earn a huge amount of money every year.

In conclusion, although demolishing old buildings can provide people safety and modern facilities, preserving these premises can benefit locals by creating job opportunities and generating revenue.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0

The response discusses both options and gives a clear preference for preserving historic buildings, linking this to tourism, local jobs, and income. The example of Amritsar, including the Golden Temple and Jallianwala Bagh, makes the preservation argument more concrete. The case for replacement is also relevant, particularly the points about safety and modern facilities. However, the facilities example focuses on household appliances and chores, which is not clearly connected to town halls or art galleries. The safety point is also asserted rather than explained with a specific example. Develop these ideas more directly around public buildings, such as accessibility, structural risks, or the services a modern civic building can provide, and explain your position more fully.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.5

The essay has a clear overall structure: an introduction, separate paragraphs for the two views, and a conclusion that restates the contrast. Signposting such as “On the one hand” and “On the other hand” helps readers follow the discussion, and the Amritsar example is placed appropriately within the preservation paragraph. Some links are mechanical or unclear, however. “To explain this” and “To explicate this” repeat the same function, while “As a result” does not clearly show how learning about history leads to jobs and income. The opening sentence beginning “While some would argue…” is also a fragment, which interrupts the flow. Use more precise links between claims and explanations, and connect each example explicitly to the point it supports.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

The response uses a relevant range of topic vocabulary, including “preserved,” “renovating,” “maintaining,” “tourist attraction,” and “revenue.” These choices help communicate the main ideas, and the writer attempts some less common expressions. However, several combinations are inaccurate or unnatural, such as “a numerous of facilities,” “peak tourist attraction city,” and “enhance the source of income.” “Ancient buildings” is also not always an exact substitute for the older public buildings in the prompt. These word-choice and collocation issues make parts of the argument less precise, although the overall meaning remains understandable. Aim for natural combinations such as “a range of facilities,” “a major tourist destination,” and “increase local income,” and check that vocabulary fits the specific building type.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 6.0

There is a mix of simple and complex sentence forms, including a conditional-style example (“In severe weather conditions any incident can happen”) and clauses introduced by “although” and “because.” Most ideas remain understandable, but some grammatical errors are noticeable. The opening “While some would argue…” is a dependent clause without a main clause. Other examples include “spending money on historical building,” which needs an article or plural form, and “a numerous of facilities,” where the determiner pattern is incorrect. In “falling of such buildings can injure someone,” the noun phrase also needs a clearer grammatical form. Review sentence completeness, articles, and countable-noun patterns, while continuing to use varied sentence structures.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.