Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Recent IELTS Exams (Canada & India) · 2026-11-12

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Some people believe that old buildings, such as town halls and art galleries, should be restored, even though this can be costly. Others argue that governments should replace them with new, modern buildings.

Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 6.0)

We are living in a fast-paced modern world, where innovation and initiative take place every day. Focus is shifted to optimize everything to increase the throughput; this can be observed in all the fields such as electronics, construction, nutrition, etc. In this era, some people believe that old buildings, such as town halls and art galleries, should be restored at any cost. On the other hand, a group of society argue that governments should convert them into modern buildings. I believe heritage buildings need to be preserved. Both views will be discussed in this essay.

First and foremost reason to restore the art galleries is the artifacts that they contain, which are sometimes worth a fortune. Secondly, structure and antics should have historical value that can not be measured in revenue. For instance, people can get inspired by memorials, ancient coins and war equipment. This brings a sense of pride to the related individuals. Additionally, this could attract tourism and improve the local economy by boosting the sale of services and goods in the surroundings. For instance, schools can schedule a tour to these places where children can learn about their history while looking at the same time.

However, some people argue that converting the town halls into a modern structure can help to manage the housing and space problems in metro cities. For instance, an old gallery could be replaced with a skyscraper to provide space for living and working to the booming population in the urban cities.

At the end, I want to state that heritage structures such as art galleries and museum should be kept for locals to visit because of their historical value. The governments should encourage people to explore heritage sites by advertising and giving free entry to students.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.5

You discuss both positions and state a clear preference for preserving heritage buildings, so the response addresses the main parts of the task. The restoration case includes relevant reasons—historical value, civic pride and tourism—and the school-visit example helps illustrate educational benefits. However, the opposing view is developed much less fully: the suggestion that a skyscraper could ease housing and space pressures is relevant, but it is not explained or supported with a specific example. The opening also shifts the prompt’s wording from restoration “even though this can be costly” to restoration “at any cost,” and the cost issue is not considered. Develop both sides more evenly and explain why your preferred option is worth its expense.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0

The essay has a clear overall arrangement: an introduction, a paragraph supporting restoration, a contrasting paragraph, and a conclusion that restates your position. Signposting such as “On the other hand,” “However,” and “At the end” makes the broad direction easy to follow. Within the restoration paragraph, the points about artifacts, historical value, tourism and school visits are relevant, but their links could be made more explicit so the paragraph reads as a connected argument rather than a sequence of additions. The contrast paragraph is brief, and the conclusion introduces advertising and free student entry without developing these proposals earlier. Use clearer links between claims and examples, and make the conclusion follow directly from the discussion.

Lexical Resource: Band 6.0

You use an adequate range of vocabulary for the topic, including “historical value,” “local economy,” “artifacts,” and “booming population.” These choices help communicate the main ideas, and some less common terms are attempted. However, several expressions are inaccurate or unnatural, such as “initiative take place,” “Focus is shifted,” “structure and antics,” and “a group of society argue.” “Throughput” is also an awkward choice for a general discussion of urban development. These word-choice and collocation problems sometimes make the intended meaning less precise, although the overall message remains understandable. Prefer familiar, accurate phrasing where uncertain, and check that each less common word fits its context.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5

You use a mix of simple and complex sentence forms, including relative clauses (“artifacts that they contain”) and a conditional-style explanation of how redevelopment could provide space. Most sentences communicate their main point, but some grammatical errors remain. For example, “a group of society argue” has a subject–verb agreement problem, while “art galleries and museum should be kept” needs a plural form and matching verb. The phrase “First and foremost reason” also needs an article, and “can not” is conventionally written as one word. Review agreement, articles and plural forms, and proofread punctuation and spacing. More consistently accurate sentences would make the argument easier to read.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.