Band 6.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 6.5 · Recent IELTS Exams (Canada & India) · 2026-07-24
IELTS Writing Task 2 question
Some people believe that old buildings, such as town halls and art galleries, should be restored, even though this can be costly. Others argue that governments should replace them with new, modern buildings.
Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Student answer (Band 6.5)
In this modern heritage building play a vital role in tourist attrection. Some people argue that government should spend more money in conservation of old building, while other believe that old building should be replaced by modern infrastructure. In my opinion old building are equally important for the tourist attraction.
On the one hand, restoring old building is more expensive compere to new construction. Heritage monuments play a vital role in tourist attraction, people from different countries travel to visit old building. As a result, tourist boost the economy growth and also creates employment opportunity for local community. For example, research publiced in 'Times of India' suggested the rate of tourist has increased messively after restoration of old monuments.
On the other hand, restoration of old building cost more, so government should replace them with new construction. Replacing old building is easier, because old buildings need special kind of skilled workers, which are very expensive. Furthermore, old building acquires more land, while new vertical infrasturactre can be built in less space and they are more operational. Additionally, due to its heritage value the land surroned it cannot be used for new construction as per the laws of construction. For example, 'Hotel Taj' is one of the oldest hotel in city center, which occupe more space and as per laws there is no new construction in 1.5 kms.
In conclusion, restoration of old building is expensive, it has lots of benifites, whereas replacing it with modern building cannot creates any econocial growth. In my opinion government should spend more in restoring old building, rather the spending money on new construction, because it helps in attract t
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 6.5 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 7.0 |
| Lexical Resource | 6.5 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 6.0 |
| Overall | 6.5 |
Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 6.5
The response addresses both sides of the argument and provides a clear personal opinion. However, the development of ideas is somewhat uneven. While the benefits of restoration are mentioned, the explanation of why modern buildings might be preferred is more detailed. The conclusion is incomplete, cutting off mid-sentence, which prevents a full summary of the argument. To improve, ensure that each body paragraph provides a balanced level of detail and that the conclusion is fully articulated to reinforce your position.
Coherence and Cohesion — Band 7.0
The essay is organized into logical paragraphs, and there is a clear progression of ideas. Cohesive devices such as 'On the one hand,' 'On the other hand,' and 'Furthermore' are used effectively to signal transitions. However, there are some issues with referencing and flow; for example, the opening sentence is grammatically fragmented, which slightly disrupts the initial coherence. Paragraphing is used appropriately to separate the different viewpoints, which helps the reader follow the argument structure.
Lexical Resource — Band 6.5
The vocabulary is generally adequate for the task, though there are several spelling errors such as 'attrection,' 'compere,' 'publiced,' 'messively,' 'infrasturactre,' and 'surroned.' These errors do not impede communication but indicate a need for more careful proofreading. There is an attempt to use topic-specific vocabulary like 'conservation,' 'infrastructure,' and 'heritage value,' which is positive. To reach a higher band, focus on accurate spelling and expanding the range of collocations used to describe economic and architectural concepts.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 6.0
The essay uses a mix of simple and complex sentence structures. There are frequent grammatical errors, particularly with subject-verb agreement (e.g., 'tourist boost,' 'old building acquires') and pluralization (e.g., 'old building' instead of 'old buildings'). Punctuation is generally functional, but the incomplete final sentence is a significant error. While the meaning is usually clear, the frequency of these errors suggests that the writer needs to focus on basic grammatical accuracy and sentence completion to improve the overall control of the language.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.