Band 7.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 7.0 · Recent IELTS Exams (Canada & India) · 2026-07-26

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Some people believe that old buildings, such as town halls and art galleries, should be restored, even though this can be costly. Others argue that governments should replace them with new, modern buildings.

Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 7.0)

In this contemporary world, ancient art is the only thing that can helps to connect with the roots. The ongoing debate among the dwellers is that whether the ancient fort and art galleries should be preserved or it needs to be replaced with the modern buildings by the higher authorities. The upcoming paragraphs will discuss both the point and give the view point that how the old buildings should be restored .

On the one hand, art galleries and town halls should be restored as it helps to connect with the old culture and roots. To exemplify, retaining the old building can helps the future generation to learn about the past and give them first hand information. To cite an example, Taj Mahal, in Delhi, demonstrates the love among Mughal and Shahjahan. In addition to this, the old buildings are also a source of income for the country. To elaborate, every year numerous tourists visit the places and it becomes a source of income for government. Furthermore, it creates jobs for the local people.

On the other hand, higher authorities should replace the old buildings with modern buildings since the modern buildings are easily to maintain. Along with this, modern building can stay long time and with the help of new evolvement children can learn multifarious things that can broaden the horizon of their knowledge. Aa a result, it will enhance cognitive ability and interpersonal skills among youngsters.

To recapitulate, while the art galleries and town halls have their own importance in individuals' life but as per my perspective, government should preserve the old town instead of building the new ones.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 7.0

The response addresses all parts of the prompt, discussing both views and providing a clear personal opinion. The ideas are relevant, such as cultural preservation versus modern maintenance. However, the development is somewhat uneven. The arguments for restoration are better supported than the arguments for replacement, which remain a bit generic. The conclusion clearly states your position, which is a strength. To reach a higher band, ensure that the arguments for the opposing view are as thoroughly developed as your own, perhaps by providing a specific example of how modern infrastructure benefits a city's economy or efficiency.

Coherence and Cohesion — Band 7.0

The essay is logically organized into clear paragraphs, each with a distinct focus. You use cohesive devices such as 'On the one hand', 'In addition to this', and 'To recapitulate' to guide the reader. However, some transitions feel slightly mechanical or repetitive. For instance, the phrase 'To elaborate' and 'To exemplify' are used in a formulaic way. Additionally, the referencing in the final paragraph ('the old town') is slightly ambiguous as you previously referred to 'old buildings' or 'art galleries'. Improving the variety of linking words and ensuring smoother transitions between sentences would enhance the flow.

Lexical Resource — Band 6.5

You demonstrate an adequate range of vocabulary for the task, using terms like 'contemporary', 'multifarious', and 'cognitive ability'. However, there are some inaccuracies in word choice and collocation. For example, 'ancient art is the only thing that can helps' is grammatically awkward, and 'new evolvement' is not a standard collocation. There is also a tendency to repeat basic words like 'buildings' and 'modern'. To improve, focus on using more precise synonyms and ensuring that your word choices sound natural in an academic context.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 6.5

The essay contains a mix of simple and complex sentence structures. While you attempt complex sentences, there are frequent grammatical errors that occasionally distract the reader. Common issues include subject-verb agreement (e.g., 'can helps', 'building can stay long time') and article usage (e.g., 'the Taj Mahal' is correct, but 'the Mughal' is not). Punctuation is generally functional, but there are minor errors in spacing and comma usage. To achieve a higher score, focus on proofreading for basic agreement errors and ensuring that complex structures are formed accurately.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.