Band 6.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.5 · Recent IELTS Exams (Canada & India) · 2026-07-28

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Some people believe that old buildings, such as town halls and art galleries, should be restored, even though this can be costly. Others argue that governments should replace them with new, modern buildings.

Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 6.5)

It is generally seen that, nowadays old culture becoming fade from all over the world because people want modern society. This is a sparked widespread issue all over the world, in recent times. Few individuals reckon that old buildings which are related to our culture should be preserved at any cost, others believe that higher authority should more focus on new infrastructure.

To commence with, according to people government should more focus on build modern buildings rather than spending too much money on old ones. To elaborate it, due to advancement in technology numerous people love to see developed city. They think that, if government build new items such as shopping mall, hospitals and education center it is more beneficial for public. Therefore, city become more modern and citizens also get more benefits in their city and government save more money for countries and public future.

Despite the abovementioned, in my view, government should more responsible towards preserving old buildings which are related to our culture and history. To explain more, when law maker should spend more money on restoring these building it create more positive impact on younger generation because when they visit in any art galleries they know about their cultural and gain their knowledge towards their history. Furthermore, when young people make videos on historical places and upload on their social media due to this trend more and more tourists come from another nation and visit in this buildings it is ameliorate country's financial situation.

In conclusion, although making new building by replacing old ones is a good for country development, preserving old ones is like a gold for peoples and also country get a numerous benefits from restoring that ones.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 6.5

The response addresses both views and provides a clear personal opinion. The ideas are relevant, such as the economic benefits of modern infrastructure versus the cultural value of historical preservation. However, the development of these ideas is somewhat limited. For instance, the argument regarding tourism and social media is a good point, but it could be expanded with more specific detail to fully support the claim. The position is consistent throughout the essay, and all parts of the prompt are addressed, meeting the requirements for a Band 6.0.

Coherence and Cohesion — Band 6.5

The essay is organized into clear paragraphs, each with a central topic. Cohesive devices are used, such as 'To commence with', 'Despite the abovementioned', and 'In conclusion', though some transitions feel slightly mechanical or forced. Referencing is generally clear, although there are occasional lapses in flow due to awkward phrasing. The logical progression is evident, moving from the modern perspective to the preservationist view and finally the conclusion. The paragraphing is appropriate, and the overall structure supports the reader's understanding of the argument.

Lexical Resource — Band 6.5

The vocabulary is adequate for the task but lacks variety and precision. There are several instances of awkward word choices, such as 'old culture becoming fade' instead of 'fading' and 'higher authority' instead of 'the government'. Some phrases are repetitive, and there are minor errors in word formation, such as 'ameliorate country's financial situation' where the verb usage is incorrect. While the meaning is generally clear, the range of vocabulary is limited, and the student struggles with more sophisticated collocations, which is characteristic of a Band 5.5 or 6.0 level.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 6.0

The essay contains a mix of simple and complex sentence structures. However, there are frequent grammatical errors, particularly with subject-verb agreement ('city become more modern'), article usage ('in any art galleries'), and tense consistency. Some sentences are structurally awkward, such as 'when law maker should spend more money on restoring these building it create more positive impact'. While these errors are noticeable, they do not consistently impede communication. The student demonstrates an attempt at complex structures, but control is inconsistent, leading to a score of 5.5.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.