Band 6.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.5 · Recent IELTS Exams (Canada & India) · 2026-08-02

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Some people believe that old buildings, such as town halls and art galleries, should be restored, even though this can be costly. Others argue that governments should replace them with new, modern buildings.

Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 6.5)

A mass proportion of individuals believe that ancient things should be reserved carefully. On the contrary, some believe that these building should be changed according to time with new buildings. Both views will be discussed in the following paragraphs. I firmly opine that these should be maintained properly for the future generations.

Some mass said that it is the mandatory to restore the traditional things like forts, bridges, walls , towers, palaces, old museum in a proper way as these things are helpful to find the footprints of past of any country which plays significant role to remind our ancestors and their old things. It also revive the energy and mood of new youth to connect with the roots of culture and traditions. For example, If a citizens visit on these places, visitors will try to know about the history of that place. In this way, it is helpful to recharge old memories in their minds.

On the other hand some people said that old places should be changed as the need of the modern time. They thought that modern buildings are model of new development which are very fruitful for the young ones. For instance, new towers , galleries are useful for the new generations as it provide some guidance and attract people towards modern buildings.

I strongly opine that old buildings should be reserved to see the prints of the past history which always help people to learn from the past things. For example, people learn new tactics or styles by looking old things. Ancient things are old storage of things that is treasure for new citizens. They can get many valueable things

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 6.5

The response addresses both sides of the argument and provides a clear personal opinion. However, the development of ideas is somewhat limited. While you mention the importance of history and the benefits of modern development, the arguments lack depth and specific, well-explained examples. For instance, the mention of 'new tactics or styles' by looking at old buildings is vague. To reach a higher band, ensure that each point is fully extended with logical reasoning and concrete illustrations. The position is consistent throughout, but the overall development remains at a basic level.

Coherence and Cohesion — Band 6.5

The essay is organized into logical paragraphs, which helps the reader follow the progression of ideas. You use basic cohesive devices such as 'On the contrary', 'On the other hand', and 'For example' to link sentences. However, the flow between some sentences is slightly mechanical, and the use of referencing is occasionally unclear (e.g., 'Some mass said'). Paragraphing is used appropriately to separate the two views and your own opinion. To improve, focus on using a wider variety of linking words and ensuring that the transition between ideas is smoother and less repetitive.

Lexical Resource — Band 6.0

The vocabulary is generally adequate for the task, but it is often repetitive and lacks precision. Phrases like 'mass proportion of individuals' and 'ancient things' are slightly unnatural in this context. There are also some word choice errors, such as 'reserved' instead of 'preserved' and 'valueable' (spelling error). You attempt to use some topic-specific vocabulary like 'traditional', 'ancestors', and 'modern development', but the range is limited. To achieve a higher score, try to incorporate more precise collocations and avoid repeating the same basic descriptors throughout the essay.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 6.0

The essay contains a mix of simple and complex sentence structures. However, there are frequent grammatical errors that occasionally hinder the flow, such as subject-verb agreement issues ('Some mass said', 'these building should be changed') and article usage ('the footprints of past', 'visit on these places'). While the meaning is generally clear, these persistent errors prevent the writing from reaching a higher band. To improve, focus on proofreading for basic subject-verb agreement and ensuring that articles and prepositions are used correctly in your sentences.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.