Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Recent IELTS Exams (Canada & India) · 2026-08-03
IELTS Writing Task 2 question
Some people believe that old buildings, such as town halls and art galleries, should be restored, even though this can be costly. Others argue that governments should replace them with new, modern buildings.
Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Student answer (Band 6.0)
Some individuals believe that ancient buildings such as city halls and art museum, should be repaired, even if it is expensive. Others disagree that government should renovated them with recent buildings. This essay will discuss both perspective before explaining why I believe that old building such as town halls and art galleries should be restored.
Some people believe that restoring old buildings even though it's expensive gives respect to the older generations and also help in preserving cultural heritage. For example, Ojukwu bunker, it is an underground tunnel which he built to seek refuge during the Nigerian-Biafran war in 1957. The building is still preserved as it was then and people now visit it for tours. In addition, it can be used to attract tourists especially foreigners to visit and learn the history of the country. For instance, Olumo rock, which is located in Ogun state is now a tourist site. There is a tour guide that explains how it came about.
On the other hand, others believe that the government should replace them with new and modern buildings because some of the products used are not in existence and are hard to purchase so changing it entirely is the best. For illustrate that, the windows used in obafemi art galleries have stopped been produced a long time ago so it difficult to get. Futhermore, new structures makes it lively and colourful unlike the dull pattern used in the olden days.
In conclusion, I believe old building such as town halls and art galleries should be restored because it is a preserve cultural heritage and tourist attraction.
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 6.0 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 6.5 |
| Lexical Resource | 6.0 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 5.5 |
| Overall | 6.0 |
Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 6.0
The response addresses both views and provides a clear personal opinion. The ideas are relevant, such as the preservation of cultural heritage and the practical difficulties of sourcing materials for old buildings. However, the development of these ideas is somewhat uneven. The examples provided, such as the Ojukwu bunker and Olumo rock, are specific and relevant, which helps support the arguments. To reach a higher band, the essay would benefit from more depth in the discussion of the 'modern building' perspective, as the current explanation regarding material scarcity is a bit brief. Overall, the task is addressed adequately.
Coherence and Cohesion — Band 6.5
The essay is organised into clear paragraphs, each with a central topic. There is a logical progression of ideas from the introduction to the body paragraphs and the conclusion. Cohesive devices are used, such as 'In addition', 'On the other hand', and 'For instance', though some transitions feel a bit mechanical. Referencing is generally clear, although some minor errors in sentence structure occasionally affect the flow. The paragraphing is appropriate for the task, and the reader can easily follow the writer's line of reasoning throughout the response.
Lexical Resource — Band 6.0
The vocabulary used is generally adequate for the task, allowing the writer to express their ideas clearly. There are attempts to use topic-specific vocabulary like 'cultural heritage', 'tourist site', and 'renovated'. However, there are several instances of word-choice errors and awkward phrasing, such as 'For illustrate that' and 'stopped been produced'. These errors do not impede communication, but they do limit the precision of the writing. Expanding the range of vocabulary and focusing on correct collocations would help improve the score in this criterion.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 5.5
The essay uses a mix of simple and complex sentence structures. While the meaning is generally clear, there are frequent grammatical errors, particularly with subject-verb agreement ('new structures makes it lively') and verb forms ('stopped been produced'). Punctuation is also inconsistent in places. While the writer attempts complex sentences, these are often where the errors occur. To improve, the writer should focus on proofreading for basic grammatical accuracy and ensuring that complex structures are formed correctly to avoid frequent slips.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.