Band 8.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 8.0 · Recent IELTS Exams (Canada & India) · 2026-08-05

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Some people believe that old buildings, such as town halls and art galleries, should be restored, even though this can be costly. Others argue that governments should replace them with new, modern buildings.

Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 8.0)

Many cities face the challenge of deciding whether to preserve historic buildings or replace them with modern structures. While some people believe that restoring old buildings is worthwhile despite the high cost, others argue that constructing new buildings is a better use of public funds. I believe that important historic buildings should be preserved whenever possible, while modern buildings should be built only when restoration is no longer practical.

On the one hand, restoring old buildings helps preserve a country's history and cultural identity. Historic landmarks, such as town halls, museums, and art galleries, reflect the traditions and achievements of previous generations. They also attract tourists, which can benefit local businesses and contribute to the economy. Although restoration projects can be expensive, they protect valuable heritage that cannot be replaced once it is lost.

On the other hand, supporters of modern construction argue that new buildings are often safer, more energy-efficient, and less expensive to maintain. They can also be designed to meet current safety regulations and provide better facilities for the public. In rapidly growing cities, replacing old structures may be necessary when they are beyond repair or no longer meet the needs of the community. However, I believe governments should avoid demolishing buildings that have significant historical or cultural value simply to reduce costs.

In conclusion, both restoring historic buildings and constructing modern ones have clear advantages. However, I believe governments should preserve buildings with historical importance whenever possible, while replacing only those that are unsafe or impossible to restore.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 8.0

The response fully addresses all parts of the prompt. You have clearly discussed both views regarding the restoration versus replacement of historic buildings and provided a consistent, well-supported opinion throughout the essay. The introduction clearly states your position, and the body paragraphs provide relevant arguments for both sides, such as cultural identity and economic benefits for restoration, and safety and efficiency for modern construction. The ideas are well-developed and logical, meeting the requirements for a high band score.

Coherence and Cohesion — Band 8.0

The essay is logically organized with a clear progression of ideas. Each paragraph has a central theme, and the transition between the two viewpoints is smooth, using appropriate cohesive devices such as 'On the one hand' and 'On the other hand'. The paragraphing is effective, with a clear introduction, two body paragraphs, and a conclusion. The use of referencing is precise, and the flow of information is natural, making the text easy to follow throughout.

Lexical Resource — Band 7.0

You demonstrate a good range of vocabulary appropriate for the topic. Phrases such as 'cultural identity', 'beyond repair', and 'significant historical or cultural value' are used accurately. While the vocabulary is sufficient and precise, it could be elevated further by incorporating more sophisticated or less common collocations to reach the highest band. However, the current usage is natural, and there are no errors in word choice or spelling that impede communication.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 8.0

The essay displays a good variety of complex sentence structures, such as the use of 'While some people believe...' and '...whenever possible, while modern buildings should be built...'. The grammar is highly accurate, with the majority of sentences being error-free. Punctuation is used correctly to support the clarity of your arguments. There are no significant grammatical slips, and the control over tense and subject-verb agreement is consistent throughout the piece.

See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.