Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Recent IELTS Exams (Canada & India) · 2026-08-06

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Some people believe that old buildings, such as town halls and art galleries, should be restored, even though this can be costly. Others argue that governments should replace them with new, modern buildings.

Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 6.0)

In current revolving era, there is debate regarding the historical monuments. Some people believe that they should be renovated and other says they should be preserved. In the following paragraph of this essay, I will illustrate both views and provide my opinion regarding this debate.

There are numerous benefits of preserving history buildings. The first and foremost reason is that they will became tourists attractions and enhance the knowledge about the history of the country. For instance, these monuments are very popular among visitors of different nationalities. They like to visits these monuments and collect knowledge about the historical significance of the place. Moreover, it will help to boost the economy of the country by getting extreme tourism. When visitors come from different countries they invest to book hotels to stay and buy numerous items to keep them as memorable objects. Hence, this will help to uplift country economy.

On the other hand, few people says that government should builds modern infrastructure buildings. This will assist to improve the housing supply to the population in the country. Due to the current population growth there are shortages of affordable housing. To restore this cause, policymakers ought to revonate historical buildings into housing. Additionally, it helps to cut the pollution. For instance, by renovating these buildings it will reduce the amount of cutting trees to make residential areas. Thus, it will reduce the overall effects of climate changes.

To conclude, both views provide benefits to the country. In my opinion, it should be depend on the current state of the country. If they want enhance their economy then government should perserve historical buildings. However, if there id housing issues than governments should transfer them in modern buildings.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 6.0

The response addresses all parts of the prompt by discussing both views and providing a personal opinion. The ideas are relevant, such as tourism benefits for preservation and housing shortages for modernization. However, the development is somewhat limited; the arguments are presented in a repetitive manner, and the conclusion is slightly underdeveloped. The position is clear, but the reasoning could be more nuanced to reach a higher band. For example, the suggestion to turn historical buildings into housing is a creative point, but it lacks specific detail on how this balances with the cultural value of the structures.

Coherence and Cohesion — Band 6.0

The essay is organized into logical paragraphs, each with a clear focus. Cohesive devices are used, such as 'The first and foremost reason', 'Moreover', and 'On the other hand', which help guide the reader. However, some transitions are mechanical or slightly awkward, such as 'In current revolving era' and 'To restore this cause'. Additionally, the referencing is occasionally unclear, and the flow between sentences could be smoother. Paragraphing is used appropriately to separate the different viewpoints, which helps the overall structure.

Lexical Resource — Band 6.0

The vocabulary is generally adequate for the task, allowing the writer to express ideas clearly. There are attempts to use topic-specific vocabulary like 'monuments', 'renovated', 'infrastructure', and 'historical significance'. However, there are several instances of word-choice errors and awkward collocations, such as 'revolving era' instead of 'rapidly changing era', 'history buildings' instead of 'historical buildings', and 'getting extreme tourism'. These errors do not impede communication, but they limit the precision and sophistication of the writing.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 5.5

The essay uses a mix of simple and complex sentence structures. While the meaning is generally clear, there are frequent grammatical errors throughout the text. Examples include subject-verb agreement issues ('few people says', 'it should be depend'), incorrect verb forms ('they will became', 'government should builds'), and article usage errors ('the country economy'). Punctuation is generally functional, but the frequency of these grammatical slips prevents the essay from reaching a higher band. The writer demonstrates an ability to construct complex sentences, but control over these structures is inconsistent.

See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.