Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Recent IELTS Exams (Canada & India) · 2026-08-08

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Some people believe that old buildings, such as town halls and art galleries, should be restored, even though this can be costly. Others argue that governments should replace them with new, modern buildings.

Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 6.0)

Some people claim that historical buildings are our cultural heritage so it is imperative to restore them no matter if government have to spend massively while other significant portion of people believe that it should be replace them to new monuments .I strongly agree that old traditional buildings has substantial role to preserve our culture and heritage as it is indispensable for new generation to have a knowledge of their legacy .However, government has to spend it expenditure which can be used to facilitate the education health care and infrastructure .

Admittedly ,it is easy to understand why some individuals favor to renovate the traditional monuments and building .Some old historical buildings are the representation for the country that attracts lots of visitors which contribute to increase the GDP . As visitors inextricably linked to development of the nation and help the small businesses to grow such as small vendors and shops gets lots of revenue by tourists .Furthermore , old traditional building acts as the heritage of the nation and often represents the cultural and traditions of their people . if such building get replaced , nation lost their heritage and cultural significance which preserve the individuals ethinicity. For instance ,almost all countries have their own heritage sites which represents the nation history and freedom stories .This not only incentivize citizens to respect the nation but also increase the affection for their people .

On the other hand ,spending lots of money to renovate the building and monuments is of no use when other more considerable factors such as infrastructure , health care and education are taken granted .if government allocate higher amount of taxes to re-design the old building and monuments other parts of development get undermine which aids nation to develop.For example ,government has to spend significant portion of amount on medical facilities and education which contributed the overall development of nation .

In conclusion ,however ,spending excessive amount on reconstructing old traditional building is worthless ,but these building predominantly plays an important role to preserve the culture and identity .It is imperative to make a balance approach ,government should spend an considerable amount of money on such building and also considering the

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 6.0

The response addresses all parts of the prompt by discussing both views and providing a clear personal opinion. The ideas are relevant, such as the economic benefits of tourism versus the opportunity cost of government spending. However, the development is somewhat uneven. The conclusion is incomplete, as it cuts off mid-sentence, which limits the overall impact of the argument. While the position is clear throughout, the final summary of the argument is not fully realised due to the abrupt ending. To improve, ensure that the conclusion provides a comprehensive synthesis of the points discussed rather than trailing off.

Coherence and Cohesion — Band 6.0

The essay is organised into logical paragraphs, each with a clear focus. Cohesive devices are used, such as 'Admittedly', 'Furthermore', and 'On the other hand', which help guide the reader through the argument. However, there are instances where the flow is slightly mechanical or repetitive. The referencing is occasionally unclear, such as in the phrase 'spending it expenditure', which disrupts the logical progression. Additionally, the abrupt ending significantly impacts the coherence of the final paragraph. Improving the variety of linking words and ensuring that sentences connect more fluidly would enhance the overall structure.

Lexical Resource — Band 6.0

The vocabulary is generally adequate for the task, allowing the student to express ideas about heritage, economics, and government policy. There are some attempts at less common vocabulary, such as 'imperative', 'indispensable', and 'inextricably linked'. However, there are frequent errors in word choice and collocation, such as 'spend it expenditure', 'taken granted', and 'balance approach' (should be 'balanced approach'). Some phrasing is slightly awkward, which occasionally hinders the precision of the argument. Expanding the range of vocabulary and focusing on correct collocations will help move the score higher.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 5.5

The student uses a mix of simple and complex sentence structures. While the attempt at complex sentences is evident, there are frequent grammatical errors, particularly with subject-verb agreement ('old traditional buildings has', 'building acts', 'shops gets') and article usage. Punctuation is also inconsistent, with several misplaced commas and spacing issues. While these errors do not completely impede communication, they are frequent enough to be noticeable. To improve, the student should focus on proofreading for basic grammatical accuracy, specifically ensuring that subjects and verbs agree and that articles are used correctly.

See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.