Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Recent IELTS Exams (Canada & India) · 2026-08-09

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Some people believe that old buildings, such as town halls and art galleries, should be restored, even though this can be costly. Others argue that governments should replace them with new, modern buildings.

Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 6.0)

In the contemporary era, a growing number of individuals believe it is extremely cardinal to preserved some monuments like histocial centres and art places even though it require tremendous amount of money. while, the opposite group claims that authority should construct new houses. This essay will discuss both the veiws before explaning why I believe that government should invest more for new projects like better housing rathan than reserved histocial places.

On the one hand, the most obvious advantage of keeping art and history museums is that it expand tourism in cities. If government mentain those places, it attracts more individuals and it brings money to the market. Such as, when travellers are visiting those locations then they also involve in native activities and purchase some local goods. Thus, native people can receives myriad benefits from tourism.

On the other hand, authority should provide better houses and apartments for their residents as popullation is boosting frequently these days. People are facing multitudinous living problem, so government should invest more on new infrastrutures compared to restoring old buildings. For example, in some countries, many individuals are sharing their houses with 7-8 people because of inadequate housing amenities. Therefore, it leads to numerous problem in individuals lives like mental stress, no privacy.

In my perspective, maintainces of old art galleries and cities requires huge funding even though individuals are not visiting those locations offenly due to that it is beneficial to enhance living facilities by constructing latest apartments and buildings. In result, it will tackle various serious problem and improve the individuals standard of living.

To sum up, many people think that hostorical places to be maintained and it required more money but some argue that government need to build more building. I believe constructing more buildingf solve,

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 6.0

The response addresses both views and provides a clear personal opinion. However, the development of ideas is somewhat uneven. While the argument for tourism is relevant, the discussion on housing is more persuasive. The conclusion is incomplete, as the final sentence cuts off abruptly, which affects the overall task completion. To improve, ensure that all arguments are fully supported with clear examples and that the conclusion provides a cohesive summary of the main points without being truncated.

Coherence and Cohesion — Band 6.0

The essay is organized into logical paragraphs, each with a clear focus. Cohesive devices such as 'On the one hand' and 'In my perspective' are used to signal shifts in the argument. However, there are instances where the flow is hindered by mechanical errors and awkward phrasing, such as 'In result' instead of 'As a result'. Additionally, the referencing is occasionally unclear, and the final paragraph fails to provide a smooth transition to the end of the essay due to the incomplete sentence.

Lexical Resource — Band 5.5

The vocabulary is generally adequate for the task, though there are frequent spelling errors (e.g., 'histocial', 'mentain', 'popullation', 'infrastrutures', 'offenly'). While you attempt to use more sophisticated vocabulary like 'cardinal', 'multitudinous', and 'myriad', the spelling mistakes and occasional misuse of words (e.g., 'preserved' instead of 'preserve') detract from the overall quality. To reach a higher band, focus on accuracy in spelling and ensure that words are used in their correct grammatical form.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 5.5

The essay uses a mix of simple and complex sentence structures. However, there are frequent grammatical errors throughout the text, such as subject-verb agreement issues ('it require', 'native people can receives') and incorrect word forms ('maintainces' instead of 'maintenance'). Punctuation is also inconsistent, particularly with comma usage. While these errors do not completely impede communication, they are frequent enough to lower the score. Focusing on proofreading for basic subject-verb agreement and pluralization would significantly improve your accuracy.

See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.