Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Recent IELTS Exams (Canada & India) · 2026-08-17

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Some people believe that old buildings, such as town halls and art galleries, should be restored, even though this can be costly. Others argue that governments should replace them with new, modern buildings.

Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 6.0)

While number of individuals argue that ancient buildings such as town halls and museums should be restored regardless of cost, others contend that governments should substitute with new, modern structures. Although both viewpoints have merit, I believe that replacing old buildings can not erode its historical significance but also ruin their traditional value.

On the one hand, proponents are of the opinions that old structures should be renovated, even though it is expensive. The key reason is to retain their well-established ancient sculptures and documents. To exemplify, a large number of fact-based materials is found in towns halls and art galleries which provides a profound knowledge to their visitors. Furthermore, a large number of people value the importance of old civilisation and traditional value regardless their cost to maintain these buildings. Consequently, it is apparent that ancient structures should be preserved overlooking its high cost.

On the other hand, opponents contend governments should replace historical buildings with modern structures.

One significant reason is that advances in technology have influenced to adapt with new and modern lifestyles.

For instance, in India, a number of old buildings are transformed to public services infrastructures, which ultimately benefit their local residents. If museums and public halls are replaced with modern facilities, it will incredibly made living convenient. As a result, it is obvious that governments should demolish old buildings for modern infrastructures.

In conclusion, a segment of the population believe that town halls and art galleries should be maintained regardless of their heavy cost, whereas others consider that governments should replace them with new and modern structures. From my perspective, replacing old structures will reduce its historical impact and traditional value in society.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 6.0

The response addresses both sides of the argument and provides a clear personal opinion. However, the development of ideas is somewhat superficial. For instance, the argument for replacing buildings relies on the claim that it makes living 'convenient' without explaining how or why modern infrastructure is inherently more beneficial than historical preservation. The introduction contains a logical error: you state that replacing buildings will 'not erode' significance, which contradicts your own conclusion that it 'will reduce its historical impact'. This inconsistency weakens the clarity of your position. To improve, ensure that your supporting arguments are logically consistent and fully explained with more specific examples.

Coherence and Cohesion — Band 6.0

The essay is organized into clear paragraphs, and the progression of ideas is generally logical. You use basic cohesive devices such as 'On the one hand', 'On the other hand', and 'In conclusion' to signal shifts in the argument. However, some transitions are mechanical, and there are issues with referencing. For example, in the introduction, you use 'its' and 'their' inconsistently when referring to 'buildings'. Additionally, the link between the topic sentence and the supporting evidence in the second paragraph is slightly disjointed. Improving the variety of cohesive devices and ensuring clear pronoun-antecedent agreement would enhance the flow of the text.

Lexical Resource — Band 6.0

The vocabulary is adequate for the task but lacks the precision and variety required for a higher band. You use some relevant terms like 'renovated', 'historical significance', and 'infrastructure', but there is also repetitive phrasing, such as 'a large number of' and 'traditional value'. Some word choices are slightly unnatural, such as 'fact-based materials' or 'influenced to adapt with'. To reach a higher band, focus on using more sophisticated collocations and avoiding repetitive sentence starters. Expanding your range of synonyms for 'old' and 'modern' would also help demonstrate a more flexible command of the language.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 6.0

The essay uses a mix of simple and complex sentence structures, but there are frequent grammatical errors that occasionally distract the reader. Common issues include subject-verb agreement (e.g., 'number of individuals argue', 'a large number of fact-based materials is found') and incorrect verb forms (e.g., 'it will incredibly made living convenient'). There are also errors with prepositions and articles, such as 'regardless their cost' instead of 'regardless of their cost'. While these errors do not completely impede communication, they occur frequently enough to prevent a higher score. Focusing on proofreading for basic agreement and tense consistency would be highly beneficial.

See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.