Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Recent IELTS Exams (Canada & India) · 2026-08-17
IELTS Writing Task 2 question
Some people believe that old buildings, such as town halls and art galleries, should be restored, even though this can be costly. Others argue that governments should replace them with new, modern buildings.
Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Student answer (Band 6.0)
Some individual believes that the government should reconstruct old buildings with modern heights while, others are in opinion of restoring town halls and art galleries. As, this could generate little more extra income as well as boost the infrastructure of the town. Moreover, I will be sharing both the points along with my personal opinion.
On the one hand, If the government invests in restoring town halls and art galleries, it will boost the tourism for the town through which the government and local can generate additional income. For example, if the art galleries and old infrastructure are preserve there will increase in footstep of tourist, which ultimately boost business for hotels and restaurant. Additionally, it will create more employment.
On the other hand, if government replace old building with modern building there are less chances of employment creation as income generation for the town people. As the modern building will be leased to some big companies, who might have their own team or staff for business. Furthermore, there will be less of people getting benefits from it.
However, In my opinion I would say that preserving the old building would create more income generation as well as the employment generation for town people. Also, the town halls and artifacts will be famous because of it's history and the way it is preserved for next generation.
In conclusion, it can be said that preserving old building would be much more beneficial for government as well as the town people over demolishing it and creating modern heights.
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 6.0 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 6.0 |
| Lexical Resource | 5.5 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 5.5 |
| Overall | 6.0 |
Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 6.0
The response addresses both views and provides a clear personal opinion. However, the development of ideas is somewhat limited. While you mention tourism and employment, the arguments lack depth and specific examples. For instance, the claim that modern buildings offer 'less chances of employment' is a broad generalization that could be better supported with a concrete example or a more nuanced explanation. The introduction is slightly repetitive, and the task could be better served by a more sophisticated exploration of why some people prefer modern architecture (e.g., efficiency, sustainability, or urban renewal). To reach a higher band, ensure that each point is fully extended with logical reasoning.
Coherence and Cohesion — Band 6.0
The essay is organized into logical paragraphs, and there is a clear progression of ideas. You use basic cohesive devices such as 'On the one hand,' 'On the other hand,' and 'In conclusion' to signal shifts in the argument. However, the use of these devices is sometimes mechanical, and the flow between sentences within paragraphs could be smoother. For example, the transition between the benefits of tourism and the mention of employment in the second paragraph is a bit abrupt. Improving the variety of linking words and ensuring that referencing (e.g., 'it,' 'this') is always precise would enhance the overall coherence.
Lexical Resource — Band 5.5
The vocabulary is generally adequate for the task, but it lacks the range and precision required for a higher band. You rely on repetitive phrasing, such as 'income generation' and 'employment generation,' which appear multiple times. There are also some minor errors in word choice and collocation, such as 'modern heights' (which is not a standard term for modern buildings) and 'increase in footstep' (should be 'footfall' or 'number of visitors'). To improve, try to incorporate more topic-specific vocabulary related to urban planning, heritage conservation, and economic development, and avoid repeating the same phrases.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 5.5
The essay contains a mix of simple and complex sentence structures, but there are frequent grammatical errors that occasionally distract the reader. Common issues include subject-verb agreement (e.g., 'Some individual believes' instead of 'Some individuals believe'), missing articles ('boost the tourism for the town'), and punctuation errors (e.g., 'In my opinion I would say that...'). While these errors do not prevent the meaning from being understood, they occur frequently enough to limit the score. Focusing on proofreading for basic errors like pluralization and article usage will help improve your accuracy.
See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.