Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Recent IELTS Exams (Canada & India) · 2026-08-18

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Some people believe that old buildings, such as town halls and art galleries, should be restored, even though this can be costly. Others argue that governments should replace them with new, modern buildings.

Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 6.0)

It is generally perceived by the significant proportional of individuals that old buildings should be restored while the others believe that these buildings should be replaced with the new buildings of modern architecture. Following a discussion regarding restoration of ancient buildings in contrast to renovation of new modern buildings is given.

Some people believe in this logical idea that old buildings such town halls, art galleries ,forts, mosques and museums should be restored by the government of the particular area as it capture the cultural, historical and architectural heritage of certain era.These buildings not only shows the cultural identity of that region nonetheless attraction towards the tourism also elevates. For instance Tokyo and Seoul ancients palaces and castles were restored by the local government of the area by allocating some money for it . In this way, this crucial step increase tourisom in these areas to explore their exotic culture.

In contrary, some people have strong believe in replacement of these old buildings to new and modern architect. Such as making new housing societies to adjust a significant proportion of individuals in the area to resolve housing crises. A salient example for this point is that, in Singapore affordable housing sceams were established to improve the living quality of the citizens. So, that they can maintain high living standards along with motivation in work.

In my option these buildings should be replaced to have new housing and traveling road facilities.

We can conclude that although old buildings are our heritage but it these are replaced can accelerate the wellbeing.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 6.0

The response addresses both views and provides a clear personal opinion. However, the development of ideas is somewhat limited. While you mention tourism and housing, the arguments lack depth and specific analysis. For instance, the transition to your opinion in the final paragraph is abrupt and lacks a strong link to the previous arguments. To improve, ensure that each body paragraph fully explores the 'why' and 'how' of your points rather than just stating them. The conclusion is also quite brief and does not effectively summarise the main points discussed in the body paragraphs.

Coherence and Cohesion — Band 6.0

The essay is organised into paragraphs, which helps the reader follow the structure. However, the use of cohesive devices is often mechanical or inaccurate. Phrases like 'In contrary' (should be 'In contrast' or 'Conversely') and 'So, that they can' are used awkwardly. Additionally, the referencing is sometimes unclear, such as in the final sentence where the pronoun usage makes the meaning difficult to follow. Improving the variety and accuracy of linking words will help the flow of your ideas significantly.

Lexical Resource — Band 6.0

You demonstrate an adequate range of vocabulary for the task, including terms like 'architectural heritage' and 'housing crises'. However, there are several instances of incorrect word choice and collocation, such as 'significant proportional of individuals' (should be 'proportion'), 'ancient palaces' (should be 'ancient'), and 'strong believe' (should be 'strong belief'). These errors occasionally hinder the precision of your writing. To reach a higher band, focus on using collocations correctly and expanding your range of academic vocabulary to express ideas more naturally.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 5.5

The essay contains a mix of simple and complex sentence structures. While you attempt complex sentences, there are frequent grammatical errors, particularly with articles ('the new buildings'), subject-verb agreement ('These buildings not only shows'), and prepositions. Punctuation is also inconsistent, with missing spaces after commas in several places. While these errors do not completely impede communication, they are frequent enough to lower the score. Focusing on proofreading for basic grammatical accuracy and sentence construction will help improve your score in this area.

See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.