Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Recent IELTS Exams (Canada & India) · 2026-08-18

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Some people believe that old buildings, such as town halls and art galleries, should be restored, even though this can be costly. Others argue that governments should replace them with new, modern buildings.

Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 6.0)

It is generally perceived by the significant proportion of individuals that old buildings should be restored while the others believe that these buildings should be replaced with the new buildings of modern architecture. Following essay will discuss the restoration of ancient buildings in contrast to renovation of new modern buildings is given.

Some people believe in this logical idea that old buildings such as towns, halls, art galleries , forts, mosques and museums should be restored by the government of the particular area as it captures the cultural, historical and architectural heritage of certain era.These buildings not only show the cultural identity of that region nonetheless attraction towards the tourism also elevates. For instance Tokyo and Seoul ancient palaces and castles were restored by the local government of the area by allocating some money for it . In this way, this crucial step will increase tourisom in these areas to explore their exotic culture.

In contrary, some people have strong belief in replacement of these old buildings to new and modern architact. Such as making new housing societies to adjust a significant proportion of individuals in the area to resolve housing crises. A salient example for this point is that, in Singapore affordable housing sceams were established to improve the living quality of the citizens. So, that they can maintain high living standards along with motivation in work.

In my option these buildings should be replaced to have new housing and traveling road facilities.

We can conclude that although old buildings are our heritage but it these are replaced can accelerate the wellbeing.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 6.0

The response addresses both sides of the argument and provides a clear personal opinion. However, the development of ideas is somewhat limited. While you mention tourism and housing, the arguments lack depth and specific analysis. For instance, the point about Singapore is relevant, but the connection between modern housing and the necessity of replacing historical buildings could be more thoroughly explored. The conclusion is a bit abrupt and does not fully synthesise the points made. To reach a higher band, ensure that each body paragraph provides a more detailed explanation of the 'why' and 'how' behind your arguments, rather than just stating them.

Coherence and Cohesion — Band 6.0

The essay is organised into logical paragraphs, which helps the reader follow the structure. You use some cohesive devices such as 'For instance', 'In contrary', and 'In my option'. However, some of these are used incorrectly or sound unnatural, such as 'In contrary' (should be 'In contrast') and 'In my option' (should be 'In my opinion'). The flow between sentences is sometimes mechanical, and the referencing is occasionally unclear. To improve, focus on using a wider variety of linking words and ensure they are used accurately to create a smoother progression of ideas between and within paragraphs.

Lexical Resource — Band 6.0

You demonstrate an adequate range of vocabulary for the task, using terms like 'architectural heritage', 'exotic culture', and 'salient example'. However, there are several instances of awkward word choice and collocation errors, such as 'modern architact' (should be 'architecture') and 'housing sceams' (should be 'schemes'). Some phrasing is repetitive, and the vocabulary lacks the precision required for higher bands. To improve, focus on learning common collocations and proofreading for spelling errors, as these minor inaccuracies occasionally distract the reader from your message.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 5.5

The essay contains a mix of simple and complex sentence structures. While you attempt complex sentences, there are frequent errors in grammar and punctuation, such as missing articles ('the' before 'new buildings'), incorrect preposition usage, and subject-verb agreement issues (e.g., 'if it these are replaced'). Punctuation is also inconsistent, particularly with spacing around commas. While these errors do not completely impede communication, they are frequent enough to prevent the essay from reaching a higher band. Focus on mastering basic sentence construction and proofreading for small grammatical slips.

See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.