Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Recent IELTS Exams (Canada & India) · 2026-08-18

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Some people believe that old buildings, such as town halls and art galleries, should be restored, even though this can be costly. Others argue that governments should replace them with new, modern buildings.

Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 6.0)

It is generally perceived by a significant proportion of individuals that old buildings should be restored while others believe that these buildings should be replaced with new buildings of modern architecture. The following essay will discuss the restoration of ancient buildings in contrast to renovation of new modern buildings is given.

Some people believe in this logical idea that old buildings such as towns, halls, art galleries , forts, mosques and museums should be restored by the government of the particular area as it captures the cultural, historical and architectural heritage of a particular region.These buildings not only show the cultural identity of that region nonetheless attraction towards the tourism also elevates. For instance Tokyo and Seoul ancient palaces and castles were restored by the local government of the area by allocating some money for it . In this way, this crucial step will increase tourism in these areas to explore their exotic culture.

In contrast, some people have a strong belief in replacement of these old buildings to new and modern architect. Such as making new housing societies to adjust a significant proportion of individuals in the area to resolve housing crises. A salient example for this point is that, in Singapore affordable housing scheams were established to improve the living quality of the citizens. So, that they can maintain high living standards along with motivation in work.

In my opinion these buildings should be replaced to have new housing and traveling road facilities.

We can conclude that although old buildings are our heritage but these can be replaced to accelerate the wellbeing.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 6.0

The response addresses both views and provides a clear personal opinion. However, the development of ideas is somewhat limited. While you mention tourism and housing, the arguments lack depth and specific analysis. For instance, the transition to your own opinion is abrupt, and the justification for replacing buildings is underdeveloped compared to the restoration argument. To reach a higher band, ensure that each body paragraph fully explores the implications of the arguments presented rather than just stating them. The conclusion is also quite brief and does not effectively synthesize the points discussed. Ensure your position is consistently supported throughout the essay.

Coherence and Cohesion — Band 6.0

The essay is organized into logical paragraphs, which helps the reader follow the structure. However, the use of cohesive devices is sometimes mechanical or slightly awkward, such as the phrase 'nonetheless attraction towards the tourism also elevates'. Referencing is occasionally unclear, and some transitions between sentences feel forced. The introduction is also slightly repetitive in its phrasing. To improve, focus on using a wider variety of linking words and phrases more naturally to connect your ideas, and ensure that each paragraph has a clear topic sentence that guides the reader through your argument.

Lexical Resource — Band 6.0

You demonstrate an adequate range of vocabulary for the task, including terms like 'architectural heritage' and 'housing crises'. However, there are several instances of imprecise word choice and collocation errors, such as 'modern architect' (should be 'architecture') and 'scheams' (spelling error). The phrase 'adjust a significant proportion of individuals' is also unnatural in this context. To improve, focus on learning collocations—words that naturally go together—and proofread carefully for spelling. Expanding your vocabulary to include more precise academic terms will help you move toward a higher band score.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 5.5

The essay uses a mix of simple and complex sentence structures. While the meaning is generally clear, there are frequent grammatical errors, such as missing articles ('the local government'), incorrect word forms ('modern architect' instead of 'architecture'), and punctuation issues (e.g., spaces before commas). Some sentences are slightly disjointed, which affects the overall flow. To improve, focus on subject-verb agreement and the correct use of articles. Additionally, try to vary your sentence structure further by using more complex clauses, but ensure you maintain accuracy when doing so.

See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.