Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Recent IELTS Exams (Canada & India) · 2026-08-19

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Some people believe that old buildings, such as town halls and art galleries, should be restored, even though this can be costly. Others argue that governments should replace them with new, modern buildings.

Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 6.0)

Some segments of individuals argue that traditional buildings, such as town halls and art galleries, should be restored at every cost because it reflects our culture, and our upcoming generations has to be a part of this. While other believes that the governments should replace with new modern architect.

On the one hand, old buildings are the integral part of our culture, and it leads to enhance our knowledge related to our history. It should be protect at any cost because It connects us with our roots. These architects holds great position in our life, and our next generations should be aware of this. They should know, how our old buildings look like, and art galleries helps them to understand our history.

On the other hand, the governments should also has to spend resources to make new and modern buildings. It helps to attract tourism. No doubt that, in this era tourism has a major source of income for my countries like Dubai. People from all around the world comes their for enjoy holidays, and for memorable experience. For instance, Countries like Dubai is the main hub of most of the tourists. It has many unique, high rise building, and palm beaches that looks like a tree. It provide many more different attractive spots, which attract tourism from all nations.

To conclude, I firmly believes that both of these architectures has their own importance. Old buildings represent our tradition and culture, and helps us to stay connected with our roots. Modern buildings attract tourism, and support nations to grow economy.

AI examiner evaluation

CriterionBand
Task Achievement / Task Response6.0
Coherence and Cohesion6.0
Lexical Resource5.5
Grammatical Range and Accuracy5.5
Overall6.0

Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 6.0

The response addresses both views and provides a clear personal opinion in the conclusion. However, the development of ideas is somewhat limited. While the importance of history is mentioned, the argument for restoration could be more deeply explored with specific examples beyond general statements. Similarly, the argument for modern buildings is supported by the example of Dubai, but the connection between modern architecture and tourism could be more nuanced. The response covers all parts of the prompt, but the supporting points remain at a somewhat superficial level, which prevents it from reaching a higher band.

Coherence and Cohesion — Band 6.0

The essay is organized into logical paragraphs, with a clear introduction, two body paragraphs, and a conclusion. Cohesive devices are used, such as 'On the one hand' and 'On the other hand', which help guide the reader. However, some transitions are mechanical, and there are instances where referencing is unclear, such as the use of 'it' in 'it leads to enhance our knowledge'. The progression of ideas is generally clear, but the flow between sentences could be improved to sound more natural and sophisticated.

Lexical Resource — Band 5.5

The vocabulary is adequate for the task but lacks the range and precision required for higher bands. There are several instances of awkward word choices or incorrect collocations, such as 'segments of individuals' instead of 'some people' and 'modern architect' instead of 'modern architecture'. The student attempts to use some topic-specific vocabulary like 'integral part' and 'high rise building', but the overall control is inconsistent. Spelling is generally accurate, but the lack of variety in word choice limits the score.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 5.5

The essay contains a mix of simple and complex sentence structures, but there are frequent grammatical errors that occasionally impede the flow. Common issues include subject-verb agreement ('our upcoming generations has', 'architects holds', 'governments should also has') and article usage. While the meaning is generally clear, these persistent errors in basic grammar prevent the writing from demonstrating the control required for a higher band. Complex structures are attempted, but they are often marred by these recurring inaccuracies.

See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.