Band 6.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.5 · Recent IELTS Exams (Canada & India) · 2026-08-20

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Some people believe that old buildings, such as town halls and art galleries, should be restored, even though this can be costly. Others argue that governments should replace them with new, modern buildings.

Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 6.5)

There is an ongoing debate whether to restore old buildings or not. While some believe that governments should restore old buildings such as art galleries, others think that these buildings should be replaced with updated and modern infrastructure. I believe, old buildings such as town halls and art galleries should not be replaced.

Individuals wanted to preserve old buildings because of its historical significance. These buildings are not only keeping the history safe but also educating new generation about the importance and values of the historical events. For example, art galleries preserves the paintings and pictures of legends in the past and motivate young generations to walk on their footsteps. Therefore, old buildings keep people connected to their roots.

On the other hand, some people feel that these buildings should be replaced with modern buildings because it requires high cost to maintain and restore these old monuments. According to them governments should replace it with buildings that people can actually use, such as, library, gym, and cafes. Whereas, people cannot actually use these heritage buildings.

In my opinion, historical buildings should be restored because it can be benefit the economy by attracting more tourists. Old buildings in good condition would attract more tourists, which would help to create more employment opportunities in restaurants, transport companies, and hotels. Moreover, governments can apply tickets to visit these attractions, which can cover future maintenance cost. So, restoring these buildings helps to generate income for governments.

To sum up, both of the views have valid points, I believe restoring old buildings would be more beneficial for the economy as well as it would preserve history of the country.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 6.5

The response addresses all parts of the prompt. You clearly discuss both views and provide a personal opinion. The ideas are relevant, such as the economic benefits of tourism versus the practical utility of modern buildings. However, the development of these ideas is somewhat limited. For instance, the argument about 'modern buildings' being more useful could be expanded with more specific examples of how they serve the community. The position is consistent throughout the essay. To reach a higher band, ensure that each supporting point is fully explored with more depth and specific detail rather than relying on general statements.

Coherence and Cohesion — Band 7.0

The essay is logically organized into clear paragraphs, each with a distinct focus. You use cohesive devices such as 'On the other hand', 'Moreover', and 'To sum up' to guide the reader. However, some transitions feel a bit mechanical or repetitive. For example, the use of 'some people' and 'others' is standard but could be varied. Referencing is generally clear, though there are minor issues with pronoun agreement, such as 'Individuals wanted to preserve... because of its historical significance' (where 'its' should refer to the buildings, but the antecedent is plural). Overall, the progression of ideas is easy to follow.

Lexical Resource — Band 6.0

You demonstrate an adequate range of vocabulary for the task, using terms like 'historical significance', 'infrastructure', and 'employment opportunities'. There are some minor inaccuracies in word choice, such as 'apply tickets' (should be 'charge for tickets' or 'implement an entry fee') and 'walk on their footsteps' (the correct idiom is 'follow in their footsteps'). While the vocabulary is sufficient to convey your meaning clearly, it lacks the precision and sophistication required for higher bands. Expanding your repertoire of collocations and idiomatic expressions would improve your score in this criterion.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 6.0

You use a mix of simple and complex sentence structures. While many sentences are clear, there are several grammatical errors that persist. For example, 'There is an ongoing debate whether to restore...' (missing 'as to'), 'art galleries preserves' (subject-verb agreement error), and 'it can be benefit' (incorrect verb form). Punctuation is generally acceptable, but there are minor slips throughout. To improve, focus on subject-verb agreement and the correct use of modal verbs. The errors do not impede communication, but they are frequent enough to prevent a higher score.

See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.