Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Recent IELTS Exams (Canada & India) · 2026-08-24

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Some people believe that old buildings, such as town halls and art galleries, should be restored, even though this can be costly. Others argue that governments should replace them with new, modern buildings.

Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.5)

old items represent the culture of an place or countries. As few individuals believe that authorties should preserve the historic buildings and art collection.While, others says it should be replaced with modern buildings.in my opinion, nation should restore their historic arts and structure. even it cost more, as it helps to shows the legacy of an community. In upcoming paragraph, we will put light on both side of coin.

To commence with, government should protect the ancient items or buildings because it represents the tradition. to elaborate this, higher power of nation have to invest on old things to save weather it is an art or halls. due to, it represents the traditional food or culture and what type of homes our ancestors used to live in for instance Many temples of India like Kedarnath has history that it saves their local resident from flood. Not only this. Taj Mahal which is famous in world wide that it represents the symbol of true love. Thus restoring the ancient buildings can help to provide wide range of knowledge to the students about how these structures hold the important value in peoples life.

However, authorities should replace these historic places with hospitals and schools. to explicate this, These old buildings will not come in use for todays generation. So by making healthcare and colleges will benefits the nation to stay safe their public and in sharpen the future of country through the knowledge they get in schools. For instances, Germany had been replaced all of their ancient sites with modern buildings in years ago which helped to boost its GDP from fifteenth to rank two.

To conclude, I believe saving old things hold more important value as it helps to learn about our tradition and culture. but changing it with new generation structure also pl

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 6.0

The response addresses both sides of the argument and provides a clear personal opinion. However, the development of ideas is somewhat uneven. While the first body paragraph provides relevant examples like the Taj Mahal, the second paragraph relies on a questionable claim regarding Germany's economic history to support the argument for modernization. The conclusion is incomplete, as it cuts off mid-sentence, which prevents a full summary of the position. To reach a higher band, ensure that all arguments are fully developed with logical, accurate supporting evidence and that the essay is brought to a complete, coherent conclusion.

Coherence and Cohesion — Band 5.5

The essay is organized into paragraphs, and there is an attempt to use cohesive devices such as 'To commence with', 'However', and 'To conclude'. However, the use of these devices is often mechanical or inaccurate, such as 'In upcoming paragraph, we will put light on both side of coin'. Referencing is sometimes unclear, and the flow between sentences is occasionally disjointed. The abrupt ending of the final paragraph significantly impacts the overall coherence of the piece. Improving the variety and naturalness of linking words will help the progression of ideas feel more logical and fluid.

Lexical Resource — Band 5.5

The vocabulary is generally adequate for the task but lacks precision and variety. There are several instances of awkward phrasing and word choice, such as 'higher power of nation' instead of 'government' or 'authorities', and 'old items' instead of 'historic structures'. Some collocations are unnatural, such as 'put light on both side of coin'. While the meaning is generally clear, the range of vocabulary is limited, and there is a reliance on basic terms. To improve, focus on using more academic collocations and precise terminology related to architecture and urban development.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 5.0

The essay contains a mix of simple and complex sentence structures, but there is a high frequency of grammatical errors. Issues include subject-verb agreement ('others says'), article usage ('the culture of an place'), and sentence fragments or run-on sentences. Punctuation is also inconsistent, with frequent misuse of capital letters and periods. While these errors do not completely impede communication, they are frequent enough to distract the reader. To improve, focus on mastering basic sentence construction, specifically subject-verb agreement and the correct use of articles, before attempting more complex structures.

See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.