Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Recent IELTS Exams (Canada & India) · 2026-08-25

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Some people believe that old buildings, such as town halls and art galleries, should be restored, even though this can be costly. Others argue that governments should replace them with new, modern buildings.

Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 6.0)

Few Citizens suggest that ancient infrastructure should be preserved for the up coming generations to see and, learn the culture .However, their are counter opinions on this trend in which people believe that new buildings should take over them.In this essay we will discuss both the point of views .

Firstly, Old buildings such as:Clock houses ,libraries, and art galleries plays a very significant role in the history of any culture and region, It portrait how the civilization took place and, how did architecture evolves through different time lines over the period of time. for instance, In India, the scientists discovered different types of dance forms through the statues which were designed on the walls of an ancient Hindu temple.

On the other hand, It is economically difficult to maintain and take care of the ancient monuments, and the government have to take the extra steps to restore the old building in order to reserve for long years, which can leads to unnecessary human labor and other resources such as : finances, particular material to renovate the infrastructure and many more. For instance ,installing the new wires can leads to damaging the old building and it can add up to the cost of maintaining .

To Conclude, Yes , I might be financially daunting to maintain the old historical building but, It plays an important roles in once culture and it can be a perks for the newer generation to learn from them ,stay connected to their roots and, might as well discover some new and interesting facts in future which can lead to some unsolved questions.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 6.0

The response addresses both sides of the argument and provides a clear personal opinion in the conclusion. However, the development of ideas is somewhat limited. While the point about historical value is supported by an example from India, the counter-argument regarding economic costs is slightly repetitive and lacks depth. The introduction is a bit brief and could have been more effectively used to outline the essay's scope. To improve, ensure that each body paragraph provides a more thorough exploration of the implications of the arguments presented, rather than just stating them.

Coherence and Cohesion — Band 6.0

The essay is organised into logical paragraphs, and there is a clear progression of ideas. Cohesive devices are used, such as 'Firstly', 'On the other hand', and 'To Conclude', which help guide the reader. However, some transitions are mechanical, and there are issues with punctuation, particularly the misuse of commas and spaces before punctuation marks (e.g., 'culture .However', 'time . for instance'). Improving the control of punctuation and using a wider variety of linking words would enhance the flow and cohesion of the text.

Lexical Resource — Band 6.0

The vocabulary is generally adequate for the task, allowing the writer to express their ideas clearly. There are some attempts at less common vocabulary, such as 'financially daunting' and 'infrastructure', which is positive. However, there are several instances of awkward phrasing and word choice errors, such as 'take over them' instead of 'replace them' and 'portrait' instead of 'portray'. Additionally, there are minor spelling and collocation errors throughout the text. Expanding the range of precise vocabulary and focusing on correct word forms would help reach a higher band.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 5.5

The essay uses a mix of simple and complex sentence structures. However, there are frequent grammatical errors that occasionally distract the reader. Common issues include subject-verb agreement (e.g., 'libraries... plays', 'government have to'), incorrect verb forms (e.g., 'architecture evolves', 'can leads to'), and punctuation errors. While the meaning is generally clear, the frequency of these errors prevents the response from reaching a higher band. Focusing on proofreading for basic grammatical accuracy, particularly verb tenses and subject-verb agreement, is essential for improvement.

See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.