Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Recent IELTS Exams (Canada & India) · 2026-08-29

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Some people believe that old buildings, such as town halls and art galleries, should be restored, even though this can be costly. Others argue that governments should replace them with new, modern buildings.

Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 6.0)

Old building and museums plays a crucial role for upcoming and current generation youths. Some individuals deem that vintage constructions, like town halls and art galleries, should be refurbished, and should not worry about the cost. Other group of individuals discuss that authorities should replace with modernize constructions. I am in accordance with second view, the narrative ahead shall articulate my justification along with contradictory aspect.

Discussing the former view, old building, art galleries and town halls can be helpful for schools to educating the students. To elaborate, This structure are very crucial for pupils of school to educating the history of that building or teaching them engineering behind the construction. Furthermore, some individuals are emotionally obsessed with architects because of historical events. As a result, government should restore some older construction instead of demolishing it and ought be preserve for young citizens for educating them. To illustrate, Government of India renovate the Ram mandir in Uttar Pradesh to preserve emotions and spiritual faith for their citizens.

Moving towards Second view, vintage constructions can be harmful for surrounding constructions and for people. To discuss, older buildings are often comes in contact with bad weather likes rains, winds and snow which can damage building internally and externally. As consequences, a heavy natural event can cause major damage to surrounding buildings and injure other people. For example, a heavy earthquake brings down the Taj restaurant in Mumbai which kills 20 people and 10 citizens were heavily injured.

To conclude, although old constructions can contribute to educational purpose and plays a significant role in local people emotions, but due to moist and major natural disasters can collapse the construction and cause financial damage and human damage.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 6.0

The response addresses both views and provides a clear personal opinion. However, the development of ideas is somewhat uneven. While the first body paragraph provides a rationale for restoration, the second paragraph focuses heavily on the safety risks of old buildings, which is a valid point but lacks nuance regarding the 'modernization' aspect. The examples provided, such as the Ram Mandir and the Taj restaurant, are relevant but could be better integrated to support the argument more logically. The position is consistent, but the depth of analysis is limited, preventing it from reaching a higher band.

Coherence and Cohesion — Band 6.0

The essay is organized into logical paragraphs, each with a clear focus. Cohesive devices are used, such as 'Discussing the former view' and 'Moving towards Second view', though some transitions feel mechanical or slightly unnatural. The referencing is generally clear, but there are instances where the flow between sentences is slightly disjointed. Paragraphing is used appropriately to separate the two viewpoints and the conclusion. Overall, the progression of ideas is coherent, but the use of cohesive devices could be more sophisticated to improve the flow.

Lexical Resource — Band 5.5

The range of vocabulary is adequate for the task, but it is somewhat limited and occasionally imprecise. There are some errors in word choice and collocation, such as 'modernize constructions' instead of 'modern constructions' and 'emotionally obsessed with architects' (likely meaning architecture). Phrases like 'human damage' are also slightly unnatural. While the student attempts to use less common vocabulary, the inaccuracies occasionally hinder the precision of the argument. A wider range of topic-specific vocabulary would help to elevate the score.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 5.5

The essay contains a mix of simple and complex sentence structures. However, there are frequent grammatical errors, particularly with subject-verb agreement ('Old building and museums plays', 'This structure are') and article usage. Some sentences are awkward, such as 'older buildings are often comes in contact with'. While these errors do not completely impede communication, they are frequent enough to be noticeable and affect the overall fluency. To improve, the student should focus on basic grammatical accuracy, particularly pluralization and verb tense consistency.

See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.