Band 6.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 6.5 · Recent IELTS Exams (Canada & India) · 2026-09-09
IELTS Writing Task 2 question
Some people believe that old buildings, such as town halls and art galleries, should be restored, even though this can be costly. Others argue that governments should replace them with new, modern buildings.
Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Student answer (Band 6.5)
It is often argued that many individuals think that old buildings, such as town halls and art galleries, should be renovated at any cost, while others hold a belief that governments should replace them with the new and modern buildings. Both arguments have valid reasons, and this essay will discuss both perspectives and explain why I strongly believe that old structures should be restored regardless of cost.
The most important reason is that it is our responsibility to preserve our ancient's work and appreciate it. There are several ancient landmarks which can reflect the cultural heritage and traditions. Therefore, it is our duty to preserve and maintain these old buildings such as town halls and art galleries at any cost. These historical work gives insight into the history and cultural traditions of particular regions. For example, the Laxmi villas palace is the largest castle in the city of Gujarat State, which maintained by the local government. Additionally, preservation of old structures can help new generation to gain knowledge about their native places. Moreover, restored buildings boost local economy by attract tourist. Overall, it would be a great idea to restored old buildings including town halls and art galleries.
However, some people argue that authorities should replace them with modern buildings due to several possible reasons. The main reason is increasing number of populations. Nowadays people may find difficulties to find a place to live in a city area, similarly it is not possible to commute every day from distant areas. Hence, it is reasonable to replace old structures with new and modern buildings. Another point is government should solve the recent concerns practically, instead of preserving the old buildings. Ultimately, modernization will help cities to grow in the future.
To conclude, although it seems reasonable to replace old buildings with modern structures, I strongly believe that it is crucial to preserve ancient work as it not only provides greater insight into history and cultural values but also attracts tourist.
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 6.5 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 6.5 |
| Lexical Resource | 6.0 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 6.0 |
| Overall | 6.5 |
Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 6.5
The response addresses all parts of the prompt, discussing both views and providing a clear personal opinion. The ideas are relevant, such as cultural heritage and economic benefits for restoration, and population pressure for modernization. However, some arguments are slightly under-developed; for instance, the point about government solving 'recent concerns' is vague. The position is consistent throughout the essay. To reach a higher band, the student should provide more specific, nuanced explanations for the opposing view and ensure the conclusion fully synthesizes the arguments presented rather than just restating them.
Coherence and Cohesion — Band 6.5
The essay is logically organized into clear paragraphs, each with a central theme. Cohesive devices are used, such as 'The most important reason', 'Additionally', 'Moreover', and 'However'. While the progression is generally clear, some transitions feel slightly mechanical or repetitive. The use of referencing is mostly effective, though there are minor issues with flow between sentences in the second paragraph. Overall, the paragraphing is appropriate, and the reader can easily follow the writer's line of reasoning throughout the text.
Lexical Resource — Band 6.0
The vocabulary is generally adequate for the task. The student uses some topic-specific terms like 'cultural heritage', 'landmarks', and 'modernization'. However, there are some inaccuracies in word choice and collocation, such as 'ancient's work' (should be 'ancestral work' or 'historical works') and 'attract tourist' (should be 'attract tourists'). The range is sufficient to convey meaning, but there is a lack of more sophisticated or idiomatic expressions that would characterize a higher band score. Improving precision in word forms will enhance the quality of the writing.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 6.0
The student uses a mix of simple and complex sentence structures. There are several grammatical errors, such as 'the new and modern buildings' (unnecessary article), 'historical work gives' (subject-verb agreement), 'which maintained by' (missing auxiliary verb), and 'to restored' (incorrect infinitive form). While these errors are frequent, they do not significantly impede communication. To improve, the student needs to focus on subject-verb agreement, article usage, and ensuring verb forms are consistent after infinitives or auxiliary verbs.
See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.