Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Recent IELTS Exams (Canada & India) · 2026-09-16

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Some people believe that old buildings, such as town halls and art galleries, should be restored, even though this can be costly. Others argue that governments should replace them with new, modern buildings.

Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 6.0)

It is often argued that it is a positive thing to redevelop the old buildings which can bring in so many advantages, while other believe that government should support to develop the new architecture based on modern ideas. Although both perspectives have their own merits, this essay will explain both views before explaining why it is beneficial to make modern buildings,

On the one hand, there are several reasons why people support the idea of restructuring the old halls and galleries. Firstly, if these buildings become a new after investing a good amount of money. This will ultimately provide a new platforms to showcase the old architect designs with new ways which will helps community to attract children for a visit. This will assist kids to develop awareness about the importance of past constructions. Lastly, the redeveloped structures will assists the hosts to arranges varied dramas and shows which will become a source of not only presenting the cultural arts but also it enhance the sense of attachment to their own traditional roots in people.

On the other hand, many people argue that the government should build the novel high rise building which is more better approach. One of the key reason is the new constructions will not only provide individuals a chance to live in modern society but also assists government to get a good source of income by investing in these projects. Another important point is that novel high-rise buildings provide a employments to many people such opening apartments along with business plaza will assists to open varied new opportunities for people to earn or open a business. This will eventually lead to increase in overall economy of the country. For instance, In India the 16% overall GDP is contributing by the redeveloping building and by new businesses open by local individuals.

In conclusion, some believe that reconstructing old buildings are providing more benefits, while others argue in favor of constructing new buildings instead. Taking everything in account, I strongly believe that building a new apartments and plazas brings more advantages making it more practical and beneficial options.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 6.0

The response addresses all parts of the task by discussing both views on whether to restore old buildings or replace them with modern ones, and the writer clearly states their own opinion in the introduction and conclusion. Ideas are presented and supported with reasons, such as cultural attachment versus economic benefits and job creation. However, some arguments lack full clarity and development, particularly the supporting example regarding India's GDP, which is somewhat confused in its phrasing. The position is maintained throughout, satisfying the requirements for a Band 6.0.

Coherence and Cohesion — Band 6.0

The essay is generally coherent with an overall logical arrangement, following a standard four-paragraph structure with a clear introduction, two body paragraphs discussing opposing views, and a conclusion. Paragraphing is used appropriately to separate ideas. Cohesive devices are employed, such as 'On the one hand', 'On the other hand', and 'In conclusion', though referencing and transitions within paragraphs can occasionally feel mechanical or awkward, such as 'if these buildings become a new after investing a good amount of money'. This places the response comfortably at a Band 6.0.

Lexical Resource — Band 6.0

The writer attempts a range of vocabulary appropriate to the topic, including terms like 'redevelop', 'architecture', 'cultural arts', and 'economy'. However, there are notable word choice and collocation inaccuracies throughout the text, such as 'support to develop', 'new architect designs', and 'novel high rise building'. Furthermore, word forms are sometimes misused, such as 'employments' instead of 'employment' or 'contributing' instead of 'contributed'. These errors do not seriously impede overall communication, reflecting a standard typical of Band 5.5 to 6.0.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 5.0

The essay displays a mix of simple and complex sentence forms, attempting conditional and relative clauses. However, grammatical accuracy is inconsistent. There are frequent errors in verb forms, article usage, and subject-verb agreement, such as 'other believe that government should', 'which will helps community', and 'business plaza will assists'. Punctuation and sentence boundaries occasionally falter, as seen in run-on structures or sentence fragments. Because errors are frequent and occasionally cause minor difficulty for the reader, a Band 5.0 is appropriate.

See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.