Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Recent IELTS Exams (Canada & India) · 2026-09-17

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Some people believe that old buildings, such as town halls and art galleries, should be restored, even though this can be costly. Others argue that governments should replace them with new, modern buildings.

Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 6.0)

In this evolving world, only some of the old buildings are left. Some of the majority think the historical buildings and old museums should be rebuilt at any cost, and other believes the authorities should modernize the place by reconstructing. I will discuss both the viewpoints in the following paragraph with relevant examples.

The foremost reason to support restoring the old buildings because it shows the cultural heritage of the city. It is important to leave it for the younger generation. It depicts the history of the area. The architecture of the old building showcases the old designs that used to be handmade, and nowadays those designs are rare to find among the modern building. Also, these old buildings and art galleries generate revenue for the city for its own development by buying tickets for entrance and feel the experience of the old time. For example, In India, there are so many historical buildings that are restored by the government and charge ticket for the entrance and also create tourism that helps to earn money.

On contrast, the government should also build new buildings to modernise the look of the city. Mainly, buildings like hospitals and schools should be full of technology. Students learn new tech if the place itself is modern. because of the less space in the cities due to the population, the skyscrapers are also needed in today's lifestyle. In a survey conducted my the tribune , this shows the land area in big cities, is very limited beause of the increasing crowd and the need of the tall modern buildings are becoming nessisty for the government.

In conclusion, I believe both old and modern buildings are the part of the society . the old building shows the culture vaules of the history and the modern buildings needed to be urbanised . So, the government should divide the funds accordingly to manage the need of the society.

AI examiner evaluation

CriterionBand
Task Achievement / Task Response6.5
Coherence and Cohesion6.0
Lexical Resource6.0
Grammatical Range and Accuracy6.0
Overall6.0

Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 6.5

The response addresses all parts of the task by discussing both views—preserving old buildings versus modernising through new constructions—and provides a clear personal opinion in the introduction and conclusion. Ideas are relevant and supported with examples, such as the mention of historical tourist attractions in India and the necessity of modern school and hospital facilities. However, some arguments lack deeper extension; for instance, the point about space constraints and skyscrapers could be developed further. The position is maintained consistently throughout the essay, meeting the expectations for a Band 6.5 or 7.0 response. To push higher, ensure all body paragraphs fully explore the implications of the arguments rather than moving quickly to new points.

Coherence and Cohesion — Band 6.0

The essay is divided into a logical four-paragraph structure with an introduction, two distinct body paragraphs exploring opposing views, and a conclusion. Cohesive devices are used to guide the reader, such as 'The foremost reason', 'On contrast', and 'In conclusion'. However, there are some mechanical or awkward transitions, such as 'On contrast' instead of 'In contrast', and referencing issues where pronoun antecedents are occasionally ambiguous, such as 'leave it' or 'showcases the old designs'. Paragraphing is used appropriately, and the overall arrangement is coherent. Progression is generally clear, earning a solid Band 6.0.

Lexical Resource — Band 6.0

The student uses an adequate range of vocabulary for the task, attempting less common terms such as 'cultural heritage', 'architecture', 'revenue', and 'urbanised'. There are, however, several word choice and collocation inaccuracies, such as 'other believes' instead of 'others believe', 'buying tickets for entrance and feel the experience', and 'increase crowd and the need of the tall modern buildings are becoming nessisty'. Spelling errors like 'beause', 'nessisty', and 'vaules' occur. Despite these slips, meaning is rarely impeded, demonstrating the characteristics of a Band 6.0 lexical profile.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 6.0

The essay displays a mix of simple and complex sentence forms, such as conditional or subordinate clauses like 'even though this can be costly' and 'because of the less space in the cities due to the population'. There are several grammatical errors and punctuation issues, including subject-verb agreement errors ('the old building shows', 'culture vaules'), sentence fragments ('because of the less space...'), and incorrect prepositions ('charge ticket for the entrance'). While these errors are noticeable, they do not impede overall communication. The grammatical range and control align well with a Band 6.0 descriptor.

See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.