Band 6.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 6.5 · Recent IELTS Exams (Canada & India) · 2026-09-24
IELTS Writing Task 2 question
Some people believe that old buildings, such as town halls and art galleries, should be restored, even though this can be costly. Others argue that governments should replace them with new, modern buildings.
Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Student answer (Band 6.5)
There is an ongoing debate on the renovation of historical buildings. Some people endorse that old buildings, such as town halls and art gallaries, should be renovated, while others believe that the authorities should focus on constructing modern buildings. This essay will discuss both view, but as far as my opinion is concerned, it is better to restore traditional buildings irrespective of the cost, so that their cultural values can be maintained, and history can be kept alive for the next generations.
Customary places, such as town halls and art gallaries, are the areas where people visit to cherish their ancestor's livings, and can teach their children about the comparison of old and modern art. This can facilitate them to preserve the values of their culture. Moreover, upcoming generations can have something to look upto for their historical background, and those who have interest in this subject can understand the traditional values better by observing old building rather than merely focusing on history books. For example, if a child is reading about a certain type of art, he can better understand that by looking at it as comapred to just memorising its features from books.
On the other hand, with the technological advancements, modern buildings have become a necessity for the success of a society. Public would prefer areas with newer structures rather than those with old-school buildings. Hence, the government have to take obligatory action to demolish old structures, and construct innovative buildings. Fore example, in Denmark, all previous town halls have been replaced with new ones, and this has attrcated a lot of tourists to this area.
Admittedly, changing the face of a society with time can bridge the gap between people and success, but I am persuaded that restory conventional buildings, such as installing technological devices, but not changing the exteriors can help in preserving the historical values. Furthermore, we will have something for our upcoming generations in terms of culture and history.
In conclusion, renovating significant structures, such as art gallaries and town halls, according to the need of the era despite the exubrency can prove a vital asset for our children.
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 7.0 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 7.0 |
| Lexical Resource | 6.0 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 6.0 |
| Overall | 6.5 |
Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 7.0
The response successfully addresses all parts of the task. Both views are discussed—the preservation of old buildings for cultural and historical value, and the necessity of modern structures for societal advancement. A clear position is stated in the introduction and maintained throughout the essay. Ideas are extended and supported with relevant examples, such as the mention of Denmark replacing town halls and the benefits of visual learning for children. While some arguments are slightly general, the overall development satisfies the requirements for Band 7.
Coherence and Cohesion: Band 7.0
The essay displays a clear logical organization and progression throughout. Paragraphing is used appropriately, with distinct sections for the introduction, discussing both views in separate body paragraphs, a concluding viewpoint paragraph, and the final summary. Cohesive devices such as 'Moreover', 'On the other hand', and 'Admittedly' are used effectively to guide the reader through the argument. Referencing is mostly clear, though occasional minor cohesion slips occur, such as awkward transitions in the fourth paragraph, but overall the flow remains logical.
Lexical Resource: Band 6.0
The student demonstrates an adequate to sufficient range of vocabulary for the task, attempting less common items such as 'exubrency', 'obligatory action', and 'conventional buildings'. However, there are notable spelling errors ('gallaries' instead of galleries, 'comapred', 'attrcated', 'restory') and some inappropriate word choices, such as 'exubrency' to mean expense or cost. These lexical errors occur with some frequency, though they do not impede communication, placing this response firmly in the Band 6 category.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 6.0
The writer uses a mix of simple and complex sentence forms, demonstrating attempts at subordination and relative clauses, such as 'Some people endorse that old buildings... should be renovated, while others believe...'. There are several grammatical and mechanical errors, including subject-verb agreement issues ('the government have to take', 'restory conventional buildings') and incorrect preposition use or word forms ('look upto', 'comapred'). Despite these errors, the meaning remains clear throughout, matching the Band 6 descriptors.
See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.